Strong bumps in traffic with 0.2.6.3
Hello, I noticed on my Tor relay that deploying 0.2.6.3 resulted in the bandwidth going up an down a lot which can be seen here: https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/CE75BF0972ADD52AF8807602374E495C815DB30... It looks like I am not the only one. This CCC hosted relay (different OS, provider, etc.) appears to have the same thing happening: https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/9BDF3EEA1D33AA58A2EEA9E6CA58FB8A667288F... It is hard to filter relays per version right now (maybe something onionoo could support?). Are others experiencing the same problems?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christian Sturm <reezer@reezer.org> wrote:
Hello,
I noticed on my Tor relay that deploying 0.2.6.3 resulted in the bandwidth going up an down a lot which can be seen here:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/CE75BF0972ADD52AF8807602374E495C815DB30...
It looks like I am not the only one. This CCC hosted relay (different OS, provider, etc.) appears to have the same thing happening:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/9BDF3EEA1D33AA58A2EEA9E6CA58FB8A667288F...
It is hard to filter relays per version right now (maybe something onionoo could support?). Are others experiencing the same problems?
Roger thinks it could be related to this change: o Minor bugfixes (statistics): - Increase period over which bandwidth observations are aggregated from 15 minutes to 4 hours. Fixes bug 13988; bugfix on 0.0.8pre1. If that's so, the likeliest explanation is that Globe is not displaying the bandwidths correctly with the new intervals. Trying to get it investigated... -- Nick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20/02/15 15:50, Christian Sturm wrote:
I noticed on my Tor relay that deploying 0.2.6.3 resulted in the bandwidth going up an down a lot which can be seen here:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/CE75BF0972ADD52AF8807602374E495C815DB30...
It looks like I am not the only one. This CCC hosted relay (different OS, provider, etc.) appears to have the same thing happening:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/9BDF3EEA1D33AA58A2EEA9E6CA58FB8A667288F...
Ah,
that looks like an issue in Onionoo, not in little-t-tor. I think this is caused by this recent change: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13988 I'll have to fix Onionoo. Could take a few days though.
It is hard to filter relays per version right now (maybe something onionoo could support?). Are others experiencing the same problems?
There's already a ticket for this: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14879 All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU505ZAAoJEJd5OEYhk8hImNQH/0iEUOkWnff68dWMG5ysYDeY 3heRxfqGw/ZV3IGVvGw5VrvqgDz6UsvuWKD3zIF0QuDxP01nlfSQoCg3LW6n0EkX 40+JMEm1Kf4dXLjJkoAwcowzJ+TYnhX+9IAWZ3emIP49j3icKi/IvAYNzjzkUy+P IWvz81BpYK66LJZwpqy8cuAV79C3v8aHUs8nU/eVFuor2/aWC/NSg4S1cAFIRu5r Cy2o52KWswTGsYd97RoSz4CbAjTqnPz84cP5f6fVuKzd8iCoL5b3Cxy3B0xnVmky eWQLDulSJzdMWb+ItzVFHxkhHx7RWTtRTnyF3o4bjF2X8fCIwH8yl4iHvHqasro= =H90U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20/02/15 16:10, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 20/02/15 15:50, Christian Sturm wrote:
I noticed on my Tor relay that deploying 0.2.6.3 resulted in the bandwidth going up an down a lot which can be seen here:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/CE75BF0972ADD52AF8807602374E495C815DB30...
It looks like I am not the only one. This CCC hosted relay (different OS, provider, etc.) appears to have the same thing happening:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/9BDF3EEA1D33AA58A2EEA9E6CA58FB8A667288F...
Ah,
that looks like an issue in Onionoo, not in little-t-tor. I think this is caused by this recent change:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13988
I'll have to fix Onionoo. Could take a few days though.
There, somebody filed a ticket, and I posted a branch for review: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14984 For future updates, please see the ticket. All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU6csrAAoJEJd5OEYhk8hIhOcH/0XAZhJoh1v5fHXmvmlx7g76 JT6th4qa8MfRUZil/T2gk9wMIWPrk42sKcfNdjdoaLbE7JCH3lltw5tBt2srYVMa aRrOkOoNoaBOIPW23I3YrCznrwX9ZPAdzapye6g2ZwxJW3H4+Vc8fWobtpZjJEPj Pfg9qMrjWwHDBZKsv7bzox2aWRtJQue7YWM2p7wseF7i5D2P/378m25llM/+UxTh /8fWw5u7TJYmtyr5AyfVaedPdD1wpwv2+xUsPZqtWAIO1AYsmRqS8F/7v+KYrVmB ZREXgy8c6QSNnBxZe72Q3iih0MeHAxXM5QwDHSWlZ0VVYt+SAoc8gzkrhT7334Y= =qu3A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Christian Sturm -
Karsten Loesing -
Nick Mathewson