Hey, I am running the following relay, and never see traffic going more than 250k. Is Comcast throttling non-exit tor proxies? https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/7E6183143778259F025576A5803E3334AB95CB...
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:43:02 +0000, Steve Rich wrote:
Hey, I am running the following relay, and never see traffic going more than 250k. Is Comcast throttling non-exit tor proxies?
Do you have 4Mbit/s uplink? That would be the 250k which is kBytes/s, not kBit/s.
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/7E6183143778259F025576A5803E3334AB95CB...
Hmm. I'm not sure whether that looks like being rate-limited. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
Am 26.02.2014 06:09 schrieb Andreas Krey:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:43:02 +0000, Steve Rich wrote:
Hey, I am running the following relay, and never see traffic going more than 250k. Is Comcast throttling non-exit tor proxies?
Do you have 4Mbit/s uplink? That would be the 250k which is kBytes/s, not kBit/s.
That's 2Mbit/s i'd say. I don't know what ISP that is but I think private "home connections" sometimes are not as reliable as connections in server plans from hosting companys.
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/7E6183143778259F025576A5803E3334AB95CB...
Hmm. I'm not sure whether that looks like being rate-limited.
Andreas
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:47:31 +0000, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
Am 26.02.2014 06:09 schrieb Andreas Krey: ...
Do you have 4Mbit/s uplink? That would be the 250k which is kBytes/s, not kBit/s.
That's 2Mbit/s i'd say.
Correct. I chalk that up to my cold. :-(
I don't know what ISP that is but I think private "home connections" sometimes are not as reliable as connections in server plans from hosting companys.
At least 2MBit sounds more plausible than 4MBit. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
I think you guys are right, thanks. The question I have now however is, should I set my RelayBandwidth limit to 250k? Currently the advertised bandwidth is 1MB/s, which doesn't see right. Thanks, Steve
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:02:51 +0100 From: a.krey@gmx.de To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] is comcast throttling relays?
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:47:31 +0000, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
Am 26.02.2014 06:09 schrieb Andreas Krey: ...
Do you have 4Mbit/s uplink? That would be the 250k which is kBytes/s, not kBit/s.
That's 2Mbit/s i'd say.
Correct. I chalk that up to my cold. :-(
I don't know what ISP that is but I think private "home connections" sometimes are not as reliable as connections in server plans from hosting companys.
At least 2MBit sounds more plausible than 4MBit.
Andreas
-- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:35:40PM -0800, Steve Rich wrote:
I think you guys are right, thanks.
The question I have now however is, should I set my RelayBandwidth limit to 250k?
Currently the advertised bandwidth is 1MB/s, which doesn't see right.
You should definitely rate limit (both rate and burst) to slightly under your actual capacity, especially if you're on an asymmetric link like comcast. Otherwise your relay happily reads plenty, since the download is so fast, and then drops it all on the floor when it tries to upload it again. For many more details here, see my HAR 2009 video: https://blog.torproject.org/har2009-video-tor-performance --Roger
On 3/1/14, Steve Rich <steve.rich.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
The question I have now however is, should I set my RelayBandwidth limit to 250k? Currently the advertised bandwidth is 1MB/s, which doesn't see right.
As with bittorrent, it appears somewhat important to set your bandwidth, in particular burst bandwidth (the higher of the two), to some figure below your maximum physical (achieved not ISP advertised) bandwidth. I think. The reason is that if outgoing gets saturated, this can cause problems for various control packets, and for me was causing up to 15s heartbeat timeouts - I still haven't solved the "unresponsive" ARM_NOTICE messages though - here's an example: 20:30:18 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Sat Mar 1 20:30:06 2014) Good luck Zenaan
Looks much better now. Thanks!
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 20:49:58 +1100 From: zen@freedbms.net To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] is comcast throttling relays?
On 3/1/14, Steve Rich <steve.rich.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
The question I have now however is, should I set my RelayBandwidth limit to 250k? Currently the advertised bandwidth is 1MB/s, which doesn't see right.
As with bittorrent, it appears somewhat important to set your bandwidth, in particular burst bandwidth (the higher of the two), to some figure below your maximum physical (achieved not ISP advertised) bandwidth. I think.
The reason is that if outgoing gets saturated, this can cause problems for various control packets, and for me was causing up to 15s heartbeat timeouts - I still haven't solved the "unresponsive" ARM_NOTICE messages though - here's an example: 20:30:18 [ARM_NOTICE] Relay unresponsive (last heartbeat: Sat Mar 1 20:30:06 2014)
Good luck Zenaan _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
participants (5)
-
Andreas Krey -
Martin Kepplinger -
Roger Dingledine -
Steve Rich -
Zenaan Harkness