Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: "Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team" followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server. First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number. Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers. I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case. Just letting you know...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's. Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb "Dr. Who" <drwho@posteo.is>:
Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday:
"Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team"
followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server.
First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number.
Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers.
I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case.
Just letting you know... _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.1.1
iQJABAEBCgAqBQJVdAEEIxxKb3NlZiBTdGF1dG5lciA8aGVsbG9AdmVsb2MxdHku ZGU+AAoJEBFG75D/KiADL2gP+wWgU1WhgGAjdu0DmjVKqVdeF516wf3aw8h3gBRU orkCGrGCmNtCWzv95U2dGdfaZnlFSN8WdYG08yEgtlvdQoyKFlAwGQhpRoJdox+h UhLsMiyXXeGlAauOOtpf0td0j5Fd3n+ofBwg8VX8L1GWuFoXa3i55wpcvaDzGOF0 TpfTGuD21noBCKduBJK4h9zIvsA5u+8GkWvnX7BPKVFrKIMi6X5fGvAuHAzMlBJ+ HzcejMilt6L02r+hQcO7k1uFaj3LNU4vPP8vJ9fcl1baaYIaOyJxSrCiZAuqDCOL 7iGRhni0veYXcvR0LfhFyJgcSBKFKaEUol+2cwBuMke0c/LRbbBvP+ZZKspcOohu iVMv4dgEM4qt5fYD8RnJZ8T4h8Ogz4oGJUpU+BRKz30yy4m46fiuIZANf/9uRazA p18wiscD9RCc9+pUKFL5Vl3skYb6ZX8SERJi2q19YOMTSH5jLguNK1f2njppbdfr 2BaDatb/vUr7koeqggKIVGTHONv+5dZqJ84tncItlyY24voPa2peIeSYu9zKHx5U VJ/GXxXLB3tjQ84BE7iGj1W+HuoMQoI09zbw5YnTlq8iIHm17Xf/5KtUXPXTtoTz mumSSiYawefm82SSB0KlIbls4MHU9/wreN68qDmR3x8hsRTeDumo58exjFoi2jfW Us9t =xAw1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Company unmetered.com (used to be running under PlusServer which is a 'premium' brand of Intergenia but now seems to be running on link11 network) did and probably still does allow Tor Exit nodes to be run on their services. How they handled the generated abuse from these nodes 'upstream' is the big question. On 7-6-2015 10:29, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote:
Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's.
Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb "Dr. Who" <drwho@posteo.is>:
Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday:
"Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team"
followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server.
First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number.
Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers.
I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case.
Just letting you know... _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
- -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8A4DDF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVdBemAAoJEIZioqpbik3fpKcP/is+ItLJ9Ab/QooRgt3w0l/7 vdBiPLk9vAoxrGnfJl7IjqmZZUE4BfNbjUV3HJbMh8uUnTTxSlxK8BmR6NcRVdqR ogl7BFM5lYL1+8mtuUE6hc5Gs5nZXJbLkrREofq7Qan9ma5tyRQKcr6ipGYDQ9oL 4yke8ZMhsCHEDmfr1JSmEtxYVeG8Bx7BB1vj2NzUGl54OamII4/SZRGWsoQhDnTQ Uq5WytNOancOdQNM+CbkAcrfKRa4xzYc7Aq21hU/EViv7Z3YSRz0QFWRRPx1aoWe UAV4ce5m9POtqIpZJbZqJWD0nw1hxmwUe1fn+BwfHucUSaO/eUqA1uM/TEBnQnWv SANTaVg+L+kqn1owCmYLBpk78U2C7Z8r0GrofwI3BHN+xMDZJi8V7gywKZhiTbUZ sJkMdTtuJkoTKH4RGfZlSgoxIXP4COzz/S0RNhGWCOk0+rLTATkkFfSJoNaLJixD g/xSe2hx34vZ5UA7k7iXQZ3W4AxOasQTc3siZycccu/m8nk826LB366kkx3+misl txIRExXqzRX4QzqPuO1XwVnJ5HXjG6FlFMGI5uJ/svzKD679IZqNj0ZVJ5ivT0p4 eFzcsLxBcQcZEQDm6nL5zZ2l39fxClZgE/R20TDGYVIsGl+qhhnxe4099NaoEPSq lo2mhFvlH4plBDp/hs5M =or38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Let's hope so, as Unmetered hosts a pretty significant amount of exit traffic. Several of my exits run there and I too received the abuse notifications. I've contacted Unmetered for clarification and will return to this thread as soon as I hear more. The way unmetered has always handled abuse traffic is simple: customer gets 3 days to respond to the message, or the server gets temporarily disconnected. I don't think there's any human interaction with abuse reports on their side. Tom Tim Semeijn schreef op 07/06/15 om 12:06:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Company unmetered.com (used to be running under PlusServer which is a 'premium' brand of Intergenia but now seems to be running on link11 network) did and probably still does allow Tor Exit nodes to be run on their services. How they handled the generated abuse from these nodes 'upstream' is the big question.
On 7-6-2015 10:29, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote:
Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's.
Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb "Dr. Who" <drwho@posteo.is>:
Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday:
"Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team"
followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server.
First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number.
Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers.
I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case.
Just letting you know... _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
- -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8A4DDF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVdBemAAoJEIZioqpbik3fpKcP/is+ItLJ9Ab/QooRgt3w0l/7 vdBiPLk9vAoxrGnfJl7IjqmZZUE4BfNbjUV3HJbMh8uUnTTxSlxK8BmR6NcRVdqR ogl7BFM5lYL1+8mtuUE6hc5Gs5nZXJbLkrREofq7Qan9ma5tyRQKcr6ipGYDQ9oL 4yke8ZMhsCHEDmfr1JSmEtxYVeG8Bx7BB1vj2NzUGl54OamII4/SZRGWsoQhDnTQ Uq5WytNOancOdQNM+CbkAcrfKRa4xzYc7Aq21hU/EViv7Z3YSRz0QFWRRPx1aoWe UAV4ce5m9POtqIpZJbZqJWD0nw1hxmwUe1fn+BwfHucUSaO/eUqA1uM/TEBnQnWv SANTaVg+L+kqn1owCmYLBpk78U2C7Z8r0GrofwI3BHN+xMDZJi8V7gywKZhiTbUZ sJkMdTtuJkoTKH4RGfZlSgoxIXP4COzz/S0RNhGWCOk0+rLTATkkFfSJoNaLJixD g/xSe2hx34vZ5UA7k7iXQZ3W4AxOasQTc3siZycccu/m8nk826LB366kkx3+misl txIRExXqzRX4QzqPuO1XwVnJ5HXjG6FlFMGI5uJ/svzKD679IZqNj0ZVJ5ivT0p4 eFzcsLxBcQcZEQDm6nL5zZ2l39fxClZgE/R20TDGYVIsGl+qhhnxe4099NaoEPSq lo2mhFvlH4plBDp/hs5M =or38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Am 07.06.2015 um 10:29 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner:
Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's.
Intergenia as the mother company might have this in their AGB, but as I have my server at server4you I'm bound to their AGBs and I can't find anything against tor there. FAQ: "What may I install on my server? Everything. Without exception! You have full root access on your server and thus may install everything, as long as it is not against the law." And no word within the legal terms.
Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb "Dr. Who" <drwho@posteo.is>:
Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday:
"Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team"
followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server.
First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number.
Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers.
I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case.
Just letting you know... _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
participants (4)
-
Dr. Who -
Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner -
Tim Semeijn -
Tom van der Woerdt