https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/r...
I expect them to be run by a single entity.
People with exit scanners might want to keep an eye on them.
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP. On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" nusenu@openmailbox.org wrote:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/r...
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Maybe botnet ?
On May 7, 2016 2:46:31 PM GMT+02:00, Tristan supersluether@gmail.com wrote:
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP. On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" nusenu@openmailbox.org wrote:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/r...
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan supersluether@gmail.com wrote:
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP.
That's news to me.
https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/
Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, where is this mentioned?
Regards,
Apologies, I must be thinking of a different service. I thought it was DO, but I don't recognize the layout of the website. On May 7, 2016 1:29 PM, "Yawning Angel" yawning@schwanenlied.me wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan supersluether@gmail.com wrote:
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP.
That's news to me.
https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/
Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, where is this mentioned?
Regards,
-- Yawning Angel
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 05/07/2016 08:27 PM, Yawning Angel wrote:
Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, where is this mentioned?
from https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/ :
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscribers of Grandfathered Accounts must NOT: (i) run Torrents for download or Seed Servers, TOR, ...
- -- Toralf PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7
On Sat, 7 May 2016 20:38:08 +0200 Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 05/07/2016 08:27 PM, Yawning Angel wrote:
Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, where is this mentioned?
from https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/ :
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscribers of Grandfathered Accounts must NOT: (i) run Torrents for download or Seed Servers, TOR, ...
Yes and? (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/apart_from)
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan supersluether@gmail.com allegedly wrote:
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP.
Not so. I've been running a tor node on DO for three years now. They know it, they are happy, so am I.
Mic
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan supersluether@gmail.com wrote:
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP.
That's like... asking why bank robbers don't stop at traffic lights.
I mean this looks like an attempt to capture people's (in general or of some specific target) cleartext traffic, quite likely with nefarious intent, and you wonder why they break some random company TOS.
(That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.)
On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500 Roman Mamedov rm@romanrm.net allegedly wrote:
(That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.)
Again, not so. I have a grandfathered account. DO have never had a problem with my Tor node (or my other high traffic VMs).
Mick
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, 8 May 2016 14:43:42 +0100 mick mbm@rlogin.net wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500 Roman Mamedov rm@romanrm.net allegedly wrote:
(That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.)
Again, not so. I have a grandfathered account. DO have never had a problem with my Tor node (or my other high traffic VMs).
You cannot argue that DO TOS doesn't have that restriction because it does, however I never said they actually enforce it, at least currently.
My guess is when they implement bandwidth metering (yes the worst-kept "secret" about DO is that ALL their VMs are bandwidth unmetered at the moment), that's when they will start looking at grandfathered accounts abusing their remaining unmetered status and stripping them off it if any abuse found.
So I could run a high traffic TOR exit node on a $5 VPS? oO
Sounds too good to be true...
2016-05-08 15:52 GMT+02:00 Roman Mamedov rm@romanrm.net:
On Sun, 8 May 2016 14:43:42 +0100 mick mbm@rlogin.net wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500 Roman Mamedov rm@romanrm.net allegedly wrote:
(That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.)
Again, not so. I have a grandfathered account. DO have never had a problem with my Tor node (or my other high traffic VMs).
You cannot argue that DO TOS doesn't have that restriction because it does, however I never said they actually enforce it, at least currently.
My guess is when they implement bandwidth metering (yes the worst-kept "secret" about DO is that ALL their VMs are bandwidth unmetered at the moment), that's when they will start looking at grandfathered accounts abusing their remaining unmetered status and stripping them off it if any abuse found.
-- With respect, Roman
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
-
I -
Markus Koch -
mick -
nusenu -
Roman Mamedov -
Toralf Förster -
Tristan -
Xza -
Yawning Angel