When I insert my PGP key just like a block of text below the contactinfo line my Tor relay stops working. What is the correct way to insert the PGP key into the torrc file?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 anemoi@tutanota.de wrote on 03/11/2016 09:15:
When I insert my PGP key just like a block of text below the contactinfo line my Tor relay stops working. What is the correct way to insert the PGP key into the torrc file?
ContactInfo has to be in a single line. Just publish the key id. - From my torrc: ContactInfo 0x710CF330 Look it up on http://pgp.mit.edu <cut> This is the result: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004... Bye, Marco -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGvrOAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwf8sP/jkDT5Smb4kJa8RUh03p8e3t x/EyGFsh79ojeUpdu1GWI80YpP8Lub0IA9ymGOPqiJGeUtXhQRULPXhwgtT4YoAm 8Dg7UEt3rwnojKMNRgQv0gu7MAszUFad6zrqnfLiCC7x4ewhLVrqqGeZFNdEyjJO X5HKDPMsv7MVrgmIL1/Uww8pj042lFbd0m8n/9tO7Fx9fOXsTSSw4l/xammtbr7F HkbWYSInFZFIyFLAxHjqWhRTdcpK0dUNtsQ7qFoLqOl48sJ1TDAymebta8S3mMgw gt7otIg3Ap9oZ44MPl9Jl9Ws24jLbRe9y4CgobGu8aakEy66ctQ82+7zRCBY04Uo selFQ9/7knNOj9SW0PTMLYTGSBNX2DtnzVEZyyKX1/3A3/+dWhSHN+hhwA2b/kAM Pex98QLpZJ/hnDnB4zA1CC7JqndblwR2S/0K4mzigC/HmHlHdeqWBsoL+YK8BdOP qhTDq7PI+B6AJLzfZbDccN2gVPZCoAiifgFtCEGfoBWRW4SyI1ZF6vG1Wrwubrf3 IB88C9cTDpfTql4RObuq0U13svaK1VoTTfl2QDlA/Z2AVw4F8HqegPPDKGkmnotS 86i4tkNnTZovyDzmDeZW2B1umrrwu4EHrE08DOlG2UJCzKM7gZolqCRFDVUQMVAC 0pEsh6MNo5GUsTJ5LXRY =JVsI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Marco Predicatori wrote:
ContactInfo has to be in a single line. Just publish the key id. - From my torrc:
ContactInfo 0x710CF330 Look it up on http://pgp.mit.edu <cut>
Don't do short keyids. Long keyids are strictly better. Ideally, provide the full fingerprint. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- https://www.debian.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Peter Palfrader wrote on 03/11/2016 09:59:
Don't do short keyids. Long keyids are strictly better. Ideally, provide the full fingerprint.
Good advice. Done, thanks. Marco - -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGxD2AAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwYgcP/3qAFEygnVBlNZxFC449OjPi i/umlE5Nm5ZiOgZrNkL3WYn2LWCeZxSb2xW6XABEdca8cbq/1ykyIGRXelZ0b6vD Qw4+1qaY0hT1tD/ACf7V88nHh6rflYFDvSLatp1r54iig4Gj6KRsbEPcEDgtx08J MScIDbNOQ4JiVH5/v6QoWRlEMm+hF99mUNgM89+crLZGX5bVH1vgVVne6iRHFDTJ oqI2QiAoQSI8uo6luNSIN5+OEBN87TEiXtKYj9q31um5X3vIMXP/3fUBA1q9bdnz 3myi4rsCWTjBCOOYSlFyXAOFuLBeenKXFNSd7oKAjOIFBh0vgZjJ8W2dZ0WffASq ZwYzDiBnc3bHuIU8DMGbPnRSLHsieqeMmM6citLvAiZ6zmCgqC0hz4SUKqW5rKYr gJuNxTaxifrfoKnq4YdWaOWUqiKxMra9aLHi5RQCG6c0dFTxwK29Ei3LyHIQifzu yA0rQ4w5PywitOcDB8zZwROzDPw+XOfgriJ7yH5EJp01bO+zOW67VudUEz4VWtyk uThi86Jsqlky2XNv7x0YqDku4vTkPb07L+t9uc5PS9sN+WPhJq1j33BKmK6BwrEu 6ueyiZjauZpQmeGLkXtAoHOFJfiq8TsUWBdUxaCBBOFLuuBSrwPkOZfRoZXdQRfj K1kmWAgSDB9Fn5BX1eHV =fwM8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 11/03/2016 11:27 AM, Marco Predicatori wrote:
Marco - -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Advertised Bandwidth 76.8 KB/s Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear -- Toralf Förster PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Toralf Förster wrote on 03/11/2016 11:39:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Advertised Bandwidth 76.8 KB/s
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
Very little fun indeed, but still better than nothing. :-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGyKmAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwyngP/0NCwUsYtd3l42fzRbvf89ej NejmVyR3x2trxznSO7tS5eRox8Mqd9QatGrG/WWv6T0Am1a0lKZxoyDT6bw0Jjgu zB9dHPanvIVBtudWexhgFp8NNM793RjLFDy8Onomfm4Pe0kLlsL+dxLuGuI8HWr9 yddM4zN2NX2Z61vatl1P3I/NO/u+7I7kdKCzyiw7uyFICBhsVeMjJ3D7VbunS0DL 83BfJt8GsPBHgCFL2G/D2tEOXtu7zpeLC4O6/02rMs+pjUtbYJ0WajZW8hZXOopj VIcDLu1Z5uBHsxABlxXQYRbf12On0YatQNy7Z8HacKhfUa/w9FkoSgHDSfmSwBEP xBqV13CgPWn9isV598IjnYUC1fxywkr6GMj2cPTyXcZ+wRs6LHDdHJOOQm711uhZ Wzee5FFPDIdq9lRNLPV5QbkaHZWjJJT2dOmnyrI3Qyc9kEMHdF+bUzqKek2byA6l FfLbuN4VKbKs2Gk10K9hK/Orz/mH473q12jFODl/zUjxLO4cTKbBu8FdUR25s70z 5v86TR//DFy59i8Ngd237Gw/AOSodZa/wtF1oNh3ISCX1Z3WrtPeVTT6f0BzEvJA nz3E+nALS3CowuvQwkR6m6iblpk5ZE/7x0Xb+SoRBPIr/z/8clukCixoWZ52+VdI GP1WAS/tEyvaXd8FRjcg =dhOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
You have good ISPs for very very little money in Italy ... https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE3587D12AACD55486E7024A5EC8CE0994643B... just 1,99 € :) 2016-11-03 12:42 GMT+01:00 Marco Predicatori <marco@predicatori.it>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Toralf Förster wrote on 03/11/2016 11:39:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Advertised Bandwidth 76.8 KB/s
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
Very little fun indeed, but still better than nothing. :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGyKmAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwyngP/0NCwUsYtd3l42fzRbvf89ej NejmVyR3x2trxznSO7tS5eRox8Mqd9QatGrG/WWv6T0Am1a0lKZxoyDT6bw0Jjgu zB9dHPanvIVBtudWexhgFp8NNM793RjLFDy8Onomfm4Pe0kLlsL+dxLuGuI8HWr9 yddM4zN2NX2Z61vatl1P3I/NO/u+7I7kdKCzyiw7uyFICBhsVeMjJ3D7VbunS0DL 83BfJt8GsPBHgCFL2G/D2tEOXtu7zpeLC4O6/02rMs+pjUtbYJ0WajZW8hZXOopj VIcDLu1Z5uBHsxABlxXQYRbf12On0YatQNy7Z8HacKhfUa/w9FkoSgHDSfmSwBEP xBqV13CgPWn9isV598IjnYUC1fxywkr6GMj2cPTyXcZ+wRs6LHDdHJOOQm711uhZ Wzee5FFPDIdq9lRNLPV5QbkaHZWjJJT2dOmnyrI3Qyc9kEMHdF+bUzqKek2byA6l FfLbuN4VKbKs2Gk10K9hK/Orz/mH473q12jFODl/zUjxLO4cTKbBu8FdUR25s70z 5v86TR//DFy59i8Ngd237Gw/AOSodZa/wtF1oNh3ISCX1Z3WrtPeVTT6f0BzEvJA nz3E+nALS3CowuvQwkR6m6iblpk5ZE/7x0Xb+SoRBPIr/z/8clukCixoWZ52+VdI GP1WAS/tEyvaXd8FRjcg =dhOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 03/11/2016 12:59, Markus Koch wrote:
You have good ISPs for very very little money in Italy ...
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE3587D12AACD55486E7024A5EC8CE0994643B...
just 1,99 € :)
I wrote to seflow last year asking them whether they allow Tor running on a dedicated server and they replied that due to past abuses they do not allow it anymore, only with some private clients they make an exception. Did anything changed?
They told me as long there are no abuse mails and no warez I can do whatever I want. So I am running two guards/middle relays with them. No problems. markus Sent from my iPad
On 3 Nov 2016, at 13:44, patacca <patacca@autistici.org> wrote:
On 03/11/2016 12:59, Markus Koch wrote: You have good ISPs for very very little money in Italy ...
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE3587D12AACD55486E7024A5EC8CE0994643B...
just 1,99 € :)
I wrote to seflow last year asking them whether they allow Tor running on a dedicated server and they replied that due to past abuses they do not allow it anymore, only with some private clients they make an exception. Did anything changed? _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> wrote:
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.. and you bash him not running with big dogs. Wtf bro. Props to this guy and everybody that's running nodes on any crypto overlay network.
I think with Consensus = 7, not all people on Earth will go though this relay, no problem ! And I'm pretty sure a lot of people "use a new circuit" when surfing is slow... it's so easy to change relays used. So for me it's cool to have fun with a home relay (sooo cheap with a dev board like a spare RPi not used for example), to understand how it's working, how to set up correctly everything, before going in wild with a serious server directly wired to the web without a home router protecting everything, full access to everyone ;) No problem for me, "consensus weight" is here to regulate usage of this relay ;) Thx for adding a relay, and spending time for this ;) Univibe :
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.
-- Petrusko EBE23AE5
It's still valid for a learning experience. Plus if you mess up the configuration or something, you won't disrupt as many users. On Nov 4, 2016 2:29 AM, "Univibe" <univibe@protonmail.com> wrote:
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.
Until some poor sap actually gets routed through that 76.8 KB/s relay.
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 11/3/2016 11:15 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> wrote:
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.. and you bash him not running with big dogs. Wtf bro.
Props to this guy and everybody that's running nodes on any crypto overlay network. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
+1
participants (11)
-
anemoi＠tutanota.de -
grarpamp -
Kurt Besig -
Marco Predicatori -
Markus Koch -
patacca -
Peter Palfrader -
Petrusko -
Toralf Förster -
Tristan -
Univibe