When I insert my PGP key just like a block of text below the contactinfo line my Tor relay stops working. What is the correct way to insert the PGP key into the torrc file?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
anemoi@tutanota.de wrote on 03/11/2016 09:15:
When I insert my PGP key just like a block of text below the contactinfo line my Tor relay stops working. What is the correct way to insert the PGP key into the torrc file?
ContactInfo has to be in a single line. Just publish the key id. - From my torrc:
ContactInfo 0x710CF330 Look it up on http://pgp.mit.edu <cut>
This is the result: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Bye, Marco
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Marco Predicatori wrote:
ContactInfo has to be in a single line. Just publish the key id.
- From my torrc:
ContactInfo 0x710CF330 Look it up on http://pgp.mit.edu <cut>
Don't do short keyids. Long keyids are strictly better. Ideally, provide the full fingerprint.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Peter Palfrader wrote on 03/11/2016 09:59:
Don't do short keyids. Long keyids are strictly better. Ideally, provide the full fingerprint.
Good advice. Done, thanks.
Marco - -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
On 11/03/2016 11:27 AM, Marco Predicatori wrote:
Marco - -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Advertised Bandwidth 76.8 KB/s
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Toralf Förster wrote on 03/11/2016 11:39:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Advertised Bandwidth 76.8 KB/s
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
Very little fun indeed, but still better than nothing. :-)
You have good ISPs for very very little money in Italy ...
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE3587D12AACD55486E7024A5EC8CE0994643B...
just 1,99 € :)
2016-11-03 12:42 GMT+01:00 Marco Predicatori marco@predicatori.it:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Toralf Förster wrote on 03/11/2016 11:39:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF478004...
Advertised Bandwidth 76.8 KB/s
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
Very little fun indeed, but still better than nothing. :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGyKmAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwyngP/0NCwUsYtd3l42fzRbvf89ej NejmVyR3x2trxznSO7tS5eRox8Mqd9QatGrG/WWv6T0Am1a0lKZxoyDT6bw0Jjgu zB9dHPanvIVBtudWexhgFp8NNM793RjLFDy8Onomfm4Pe0kLlsL+dxLuGuI8HWr9 yddM4zN2NX2Z61vatl1P3I/NO/u+7I7kdKCzyiw7uyFICBhsVeMjJ3D7VbunS0DL 83BfJt8GsPBHgCFL2G/D2tEOXtu7zpeLC4O6/02rMs+pjUtbYJ0WajZW8hZXOopj VIcDLu1Z5uBHsxABlxXQYRbf12On0YatQNy7Z8HacKhfUa/w9FkoSgHDSfmSwBEP xBqV13CgPWn9isV598IjnYUC1fxywkr6GMj2cPTyXcZ+wRs6LHDdHJOOQm711uhZ Wzee5FFPDIdq9lRNLPV5QbkaHZWjJJT2dOmnyrI3Qyc9kEMHdF+bUzqKek2byA6l FfLbuN4VKbKs2Gk10K9hK/Orz/mH473q12jFODl/zUjxLO4cTKbBu8FdUR25s70z 5v86TR//DFy59i8Ngd237Gw/AOSodZa/wtF1oNh3ISCX1Z3WrtPeVTT6f0BzEvJA nz3E+nALS3CowuvQwkR6m6iblpk5ZE/7x0Xb+SoRBPIr/z/8clukCixoWZ52+VdI GP1WAS/tEyvaXd8FRjcg =dhOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 03/11/2016 12:59, Markus Koch wrote:
You have good ISPs for very very little money in Italy ...
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE3587D12AACD55486E7024A5EC8CE0994643B...
just 1,99 € :)
I wrote to seflow last year asking them whether they allow Tor running on a dedicated server and they replied that due to past abuses they do not allow it anymore, only with some private clients they make an exception. Did anything changed?
They told me as long there are no abuse mails and no warez I can do whatever I want. So I am running two guards/middle relays with them. No problems.
markus
Sent from my iPad
On 3 Nov 2016, at 13:44, patacca patacca@autistici.org wrote:
On 03/11/2016 12:59, Markus Koch wrote: You have good ISPs for very very little money in Italy ...
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FE3587D12AACD55486E7024A5EC8CE0994643B...
just 1,99 € :)
I wrote to seflow last year asking them whether they allow Tor running on a dedicated server and they replied that due to past abuses they do not allow it anymore, only with some private clients they make an exception. Did anything changed? _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de wrote:
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.. and you bash him not running with big dogs. Wtf bro.
Props to this guy and everybody that's running nodes on any crypto overlay network.
I think with Consensus = 7, not all people on Earth will go though this relay, no problem ! And I'm pretty sure a lot of people "use a new circuit" when surfing is slow... it's so easy to change relays used.
So for me it's cool to have fun with a home relay (sooo cheap with a dev board like a spare RPi not used for example), to understand how it's working, how to set up correctly everything, before going in wild with a serious server directly wired to the web without a home router protecting everything, full access to everyone ;)
No problem for me, "consensus weight" is here to regulate usage of this relay ;) Thx for adding a relay, and spending time for this ;)
Univibe :
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.
It's still valid for a learning experience. Plus if you mess up the configuration or something, you won't disrupt as many users.
On Nov 4, 2016 2:29 AM, "Univibe" univibe@protonmail.com wrote:
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.
Until some poor sap actually gets routed through that 76.8 KB/s relay.
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 11/3/2016 11:15 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de wrote:
Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear
He's running a relay because what he believe and it's fun without hurting nobody.. and you bash him not running with big dogs. Wtf bro.
Props to this guy and everybody that's running nodes on any crypto overlay network. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
+1
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
-
anemoi＠tutanota.de -
grarpamp -
Kurt Besig -
Marco Predicatori -
Markus Koch -
patacca -
Peter Palfrader -
Petrusko -
Toralf Förster -
Tristan -
Univibe