Hi folks,
Is there a generally accepted recommendation for how to set up a relay on a server with a fast connection but limited monthly transfers, say less than 100GB each way per month?
Having done a bit of reading it seems daily limits are the way to go but I've found contradictory information regarding also limiting the bandwidth. Should I keep the relay accepting traffic (albeit slowly) for most of the day, allow a fast connection but for a very limited period every 24 hours or something in between.
Thanks,
Ike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
say less than 100GB each way per month?
$> echo "scale=2.0; 100 * 1024^3 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024" | bc 39.14
So you're asking, if 40 KB/sec would be the better choice ?
- -- Toralf PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E
there is no speed limit? I am the opinion that I have read something about 250 kb / s!
------------------------ Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Toralf Förster:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
say less than 100GB each way per month?
$> echo "scale=2.0; 100 * 1024^3 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024" | bc 39.14
So you're asking, if 40 KB/sec would be the better choice ?
Toralf PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHYEAREIAB4FAlhtU0oXHHRvcmFsZi5mb2Vyc3RlckBnbXguZGUACgkQxOrN3gB2 6U7BHAD9Expva3Yg4NCd3tfONN+vD/uAMLZz1arzbNBES9Z1ec8A/jIGI920S7+k UhHpWBW2TXfb9nm5qEqOb+20CtYOy2lz =7wx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I apreciate I'm not going to keep a relay running 24 hours on this server but I'd like to know if there was a guide for balancing uptime vs bandwidth or if this is even something tor itself would handle.
If tor used all the available bandwidth I'd hit my target in just 100 seconds uptime every 24 hours.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:00:53PM +0100, Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator wrote:
there is no speed limit? I am the opinion that I have read something about 250 kb / s!
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Toralf F??rster:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
say less than 100GB each way per month?
$> echo "scale=2.0; 100 * 1024^3 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024" | bc 39.14
So you're asking, if 40 KB/sec would be the better choice ?
- -- Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHYEAREIAB4FAlhtU0oXHHRvcmFsZi5mb2Vyc3RlckBnbXguZGUACgkQxOrN3gB2 6U7BHAD9Expva3Yg4NCd3tfONN+vD/uAMLZz1arzbNBES9Z1ec8A/jIGI920S7+k UhHpWBW2TXfb9nm5qEqOb+20CtYOy2lz =7wx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
RelayBandwidthRate 400 KBytes BandwidthRate 400 KBytes
there are running other services too.
------------------------ Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb ike:
I apreciate I'm not going to keep a relay running 24 hours on this server but I'd like to know if there was a guide for balancing uptime vs bandwidth or if this is even something tor itself would handle.
If tor used all the available bandwidth I'd hit my target in just 100 seconds uptime every 24 hours.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:00:53PM +0100, Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator wrote:
there is no speed limit? I am the opinion that I have read something about 250 kb / s!
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Toralf F??rster:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
say less than 100GB each way per month?
$> echo "scale=2.0; 100 * 1024^3 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024" | bc 39.14
So you're asking, if 40 KB/sec would be the better choice ?
- -- Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHYEAREIAB4FAlhtU0oXHHRvcmFsZi5mb2Vyc3RlckBnbXguZGUACgkQxOrN3gB2 6U7BHAD9Expva3Yg4NCd3tfONN+vD/uAMLZz1arzbNBES9Z1ec8A/jIGI920S7+k UhHpWBW2TXfb9nm5qEqOb+20CtYOy2lz =7wx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I had a limit on one exit of 1000 gb per month - Ive set the speed as 5mbps which works for that limit (only measured on tx) so divide by 10 and youre looking at 0.5mbps on your torrc file setting - you can also set accountingmax so you dontgo over this.
Also if its a new relay then the bandwidth will not get fully used for a couple of weeks giving a bit of leeway. You can also use vnstat via sendmail to ping you when you reach a certain usuage.
Cheers Mark B Snaptor.co.uk (non commercial)
On 4 Jan 2017, at 20:21, Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator coby@fu110.de wrote:
RelayBandwidthRate 400 KBytes BandwidthRate 400 KBytes
there are running other services too. <vnstat_top.png>
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb ike: I apreciate I'm not going to keep a relay running 24 hours on this server but I'd like to know if there was a guide for balancing uptime vs bandwidth or if this is even something tor itself would handle.
If tor used all the available bandwidth I'd hit my target in just 100 seconds uptime every 24 hours.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:00:53PM +0100, Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator wrote:
there is no speed limit? I am the opinion that I have read something about 250 kb / s!
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Toralf F??rster:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
say less than 100GB each way per month?
$> echo "scale=2.0; 100 * 1024^3 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024" | bc 39.14
So you're asking, if 40 KB/sec would be the better choice ?
- -- Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHYEAREIAB4FAlhtU0oXHHRvcmFsZi5mb2Vyc3RlckBnbXguZGUACgkQxOrN3gB2 6U7BHAD9Expva3Yg4NCd3tfONN+vD/uAMLZz1arzbNBES9Z1ec8A/jIGI920S7+k UhHpWBW2TXfb9nm5qEqOb+20CtYOy2lz =7wx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Why don't you use the Accounting setting? AccountingMax and AccountingStart in the settings. I think the only downside with it is that Tor does not advertise the directory port.
On 5 Jan 2017, at 07:31, Simon Fischer tor@simonfischer.info wrote:
Signed PGP part Why don't you use the Accounting setting? AccountingMax and AccountingStart in the settings. I think the only downside with it is that Tor does not advertise the directory port.
This is a feature: tor will only advertise the directory port if it is sure it has spare traffic for directory requests.
This prioritises client traffic over directory requests.
T
-- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
This has been discussed before, try searching the archives with something like "AccountingMax vs RelayBandwidthRate".
I think teor gave a very good answer here: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-May/006956.html
The technique you'll want to use really depends on whether you want a faster relay for part of the month, or a stable (but slower) relay throughout the month. Teor goes into more detail in that post.
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
-
anondroid -
ike -
Petrusko -
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator -
Sec INT -
Simon Fischer -
teor -
Toralf Förster