Re: [tor-relays] Mozilla-Middles losing guard
at this very moment all of them got the flag, right. But theyre loosing it at seemingly random order. I kept an eye on Atlas for some time, at 18:00 (UTC+1) Mozilla13 was at 1.51 MB/s without Guardflag. On Tue, February 17, 2015 19:50, Nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/17/2015 10:59 AM, lpwzi9i84@use.startmail.com wrote:
My relay gains/loses guard occasionally, what's the concern regarding?>> _______________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU45J9AAoJEJQqkaGlFNDPrcUIAJpdIpL0+qvBVzvfbDYvwu0e 1RACWwxfsO9qCE6WpgRkBcKa8dZe+v/qeLKHuIa2CiSn2qeaZr9vs6RrVfGDPGBl kvriJQ6XmmpWZjQL0+7TCM1I7ynByuizJJs/eDcAtGMNV1KfH+RQYhUTDtwvEf3g q5iXBU0KzUya/ZfV+fJY7gDhDIhlWAx/hxsaA4sAT3TI4H9P/uS3DkJQ78F/m7Ph fL31bMW2cxNGmDVuVQsusJcIZo0Oqo3coteIk3NSz/wfiFHZ5AZmn9qwCW6edChj SpHJhCbsWuUmk9T+dChoQLv6mhQBFgvek1avCfFsgNjWkrC2A+RnBpQiolH8lzY= =k6OU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The speed matters. Some time ago, Guard flag parameters were changed little bit, so now the Guard flag is assigned to 25% of the fastest relays in the network (of course which are also stable and have good uptime and have been around in the network for a while). This means that if the speed drops down, the Guard flag could go away with it. By the reference speed I can see below of 1.51 MB/s it's quite near/under the limit. If you had for example 5MB/s constant, you would not lose the Guard flag not even some of the times. On 2/17/2015 9:22 PM, lpwzi9i84@use.startmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJU45/zAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRfDAH/166+H8bai2yKRe6lcDmjrxd 2Ymd1VH5GlntTywhDvYvnBK7y7iVhN7A/OxOSEjh2mzJ2lLY7FScpCuNJLAJnOxF gDVLA7Zd26C2tnNKr8Gc0eCR+8ZcfirXYCkxvLQfzZBDB45UHmsBF5usThS10qg2 k8LkQimtxEJZ84FjfYigEpBWgG9QwsAtqTD4sSJA1T5Nfp8yahmT7S4xxfhTUxXN Sh2dvLsQVgnFtevoNcXHPNAHb+UqdEbu/V8SEdq7hvEfs2deH46C5+l6493gFt8l khAkF+WRjSIDTxUK5sF2FvWWwkopELMlqRfkSBm7VUeebApXzuDxkzvPoissKLM= =QVek -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
right, cause of that i thought about splitting the total mozilla- bandwidth through 10 relays insted of 12 relays could raise bandwidth per server above the guardlimit to hold it more constantly. but i would belive if this is not requested by consensus. longterm wight seems not to be affected cause of gaining or losing guardflag. ...but what we want are nonmalicious guards, right? so maybe it could make sense anyway. On Tue, February 17, 2015 21:09, s7r <s7r@sky-ip.org> wrote:bandwidth
FYI there is an open ticket about this. My relay is also experiencing this problem. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/14763
participants (4)
-
James Murphy -
Kurt Besig -
lpwzi9i84＠use.startmail.com -
s7r