Well, I'm still sticking with CoolHousing/Virtual Server Lite because I hardly ever get abuse complaints. For ITL, I may leave after my term expires.
But a few other companies I found were:
tested it, made really bad experience with them, network performance was almost unusable <10MBit/s lately, they had an outage of 2 days ("because voxility upstream added two new uplinks", than I canceled)
made also bad experience with them, like "fatal" said, their network performance isn't the best <20MBit/s (per direction) weekly average If anyone can recommend any other hosters, please come forward.
I am testing www.hostwinds.com and www.digitalocean.com right now, both work fine atm. Markus 2016-07-06 10:19 GMT+02:00 tor relay <torrelay3@mailbox.org>:
Well, I'm still sticking with CoolHousing/Virtual Server Lite because I hardly ever get abuse complaints. For ITL, I may leave after my term expires.
But a few other companies I found were:
tested it, made really bad experience with them, network performance was almost unusable <10MBit/s lately, they had an outage of 2 days ("because voxility upstream added two new uplinks", than I canceled)
made also bad experience with them, like "fatal" said, their network performance isn't the best <20MBit/s (per direction) weekly average
If anyone can recommend any other hosters, please come forward.
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it). *Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu* jp@jpdm.org <mailto:jp@jpdm.org> - PGP: 0x2D61F80F - 514-799-0789 http://www.jpdm.org/ - https://www.crypto.quebec/ On 2016-07-06 04:19 AM, tor relay wrote:
Well, I'm still sticking with CoolHousing/Virtual Server Lite because I hardly ever get abuse complaints. For ITL, I may leave after my term expires.
But a few other companies I found were:
tested it, made really bad experience with them, network performance was almost unusable <10MBit/s lately, they had an outage of 2 days ("because voxility upstream added two new uplinks", than I canceled)
made also bad experience with them, like "fatal" said, their network performance isn't the best <20MBit/s (per direction) weekly average
If anyone can recommend any other hosters, please come forward.
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On July 6, 2016 at 6:16 PM Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu <jp@jpdm.org> wrote:
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it).
OVH is used to much by tor operators already (>12% of the tor network capacity is there).
Hi, On 06/07/16 18:25, tor relay wrote:
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it).
OVH is used to much by tor operators already (>12% of the tor network capacity is there).
Not the most performance enhanced page on the web but: https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html This bubble graph shows where relays are located by autonomous system. If you're looking to set up new relays, attempting to grow smaller bubbles here (the names should be googleable enough) or trying to add new ones would definitely be preferred over adding more to OVH. It's great that OVH are Tor-friendly, but diversity of the network is important. Thanks, Iain.
Am 06.07.2016 um 22:09 schrieb Iain R. Learmonth:
Hi,
On 06/07/16 18:25, tor relay wrote:
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it).
OVH is used to much by tor operators already (>12% of the tor network capacity is there).
Not the most performance enhanced page on the web but:
https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html
This bubble graph shows where relays are located by autonomous system. If you're looking to set up new relays, attempting to grow smaller bubbles here (the names should be googleable enough) or trying to add new ones would definitely be preferred over adding more to OVH.
It's great that OVH are Tor-friendly, but diversity of the network is important.
Thanks, Iain. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
"..diversity of the network is important." -very important - what if a far Western European government decides on the next "state of emergency" to ban Tor and "asks" their domestic ISPs for support? There are other Providers who give you 15-50 TB/month for less than 10 Euro. Dig for them - don’t follow the pack!
In my case, the decision to host my Tor VPS on OVH's infrastructure is to support a business that is based in Québec. Ideology aside, I agree that network diversity is key (along with the multiplication of exit nodes). Regards, *Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu* jp@jpdm.org <mailto:jp@jpdm.org> - PGP: 0x2D61F80F - 514-799-0789 http://www.jpdm.org/ - https://www.crypto.quebec/ On 2016-07-06 04:39 PM, pa011 wrote:
Am 06.07.2016 um 22:09 schrieb Iain R. Learmonth:
Hi,
On 06/07/16 18:25, tor relay wrote:
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it). OVH is used to much by tor operators already (>12% of the tor network capacity is there). Not the most performance enhanced page on the web but:
https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html
This bubble graph shows where relays are located by autonomous system. If you're looking to set up new relays, attempting to grow smaller bubbles here (the names should be googleable enough) or trying to add new ones would definitely be preferred over adding more to OVH.
It's great that OVH are Tor-friendly, but diversity of the network is important.
Thanks, Iain. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
"..diversity of the network is important." -very important - what if a far Western European government decides on the next "state of emergency" to ban Tor and "asks" their domestic ISPs for support?
There are other Providers who give you 15-50 TB/month for less than 10 Euro.
Dig for them - don’t follow the pack!
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 06/07/16 18:25, tor relay wrote:
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it).
OVH is used to much by tor operators already (>12% of the tor network capacity is there).
Not the most performance enhanced page on the web but:
https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html
This bubble graph shows where relays are located by autonomous system. If you're looking to set up new relays, attempting to grow smaller bubbles here (the names should be googleable enough) or trying to add new ones would definitely be preferred over adding more to OVH.
I find https://compasss.torproject.org more convenient for that task.
On 06/07/16 18:25, tor relay wrote:
I've been running an exit node for over a year on OVH now, no problems so far. Highly recommended (especially since they give me 10TB of traffic for about 10$USD/month; considering I use about 7-8TB of that per month, it's well worth it).
OVH is used to much by tor operators already (>12% of the tor network capacity is there).
Not the most performance enhanced page on the web but:
https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html
This bubble graph shows where relays are located by autonomous system. If you're looking to set up new relays, attempting to grow smaller bubbles here (the names should be googleable enough) or trying to add new ones would definitely be preferred over adding more to OVH.
I find https://compass.torproject.org more convenient for that task.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/06/2016 11:10 PM, nusenu wrote:
I find https://compass.torproject.org more convenient for that task. +1 The bubbles aren't useful IMO.
- -- Toralf PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAld9d1sACgkQxOrN3gB26U4x5AD/TCY/z2arSeriqVADnLYaP/J7 CofrPR3e97EoI9P9REEA/1TgWcWIBv1tFEkVVl0nvreu9Kw9vgbH2d+Dr2HVegVw =gfYB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (7)
-
Iain R. Learmonth -
Jean-Philippe Décarie-Mathieu -
Markus Koch -
nusenu -
pa011 -
tor relay -
Toralf Förster