biggest guard operator apparently left the tor network
Looks like SG.GS stopped their guard relays. They had >3% guard probability. +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | Con5 | lastseen | fingerprint | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 675C5A2C2EC403B6B583735191042CF489D4E5DA | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | C3D51AAF129FED507053244ADA29353D01AD5C90 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B9B927347E005256D5D48007C38208FE8F7CC3BE | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 075A4D8D7662DF566FCE390FC820C539BFBBA867 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 53E2060F64DF258597E738FD5608D2939B92BC1D | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 963ADC0137505151C1AFA6757DD2367EDEEC7B62 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B4697BA6520A17A7F51E613018754BA5FD46D0A0 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 951BDBA042A69FE8577129EA301B027A879B985B | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D905EEADE0A40C7C0E6A8102708CF16AB8ED9A35 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 593B6169DA24F3835F0B485317C0DB529B8F3E58 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 0519D312F1BD9668B3B43751E0934911E4C79C79 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D9BFC55DDD8152F06D87C9DA7D192E86FC628626 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 38F423A4320380FFE32DB60B72E7457CD6E3F096 | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
On 2/28/2016 5:00 AM, nusenu wrote:
Looks like SG.GS stopped their guard relays. They had >3% guard probability.
+-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | Con5 | lastseen | fingerprint | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 675C5A2C2EC403B6B583735191042CF489D4E5DA | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | C3D51AAF129FED507053244ADA29353D01AD5C90 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B9B927347E005256D5D48007C38208FE8F7CC3BE | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 075A4D8D7662DF566FCE390FC820C539BFBBA867 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 53E2060F64DF258597E738FD5608D2939B92BC1D | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 963ADC0137505151C1AFA6757DD2367EDEEC7B62 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B4697BA6520A17A7F51E613018754BA5FD46D0A0 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 951BDBA042A69FE8577129EA301B027A879B985B | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D905EEADE0A40C7C0E6A8102708CF16AB8ED9A35 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 593B6169DA24F3835F0B485317C0DB529B8F3E58 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 0519D312F1BD9668B3B43751E0934911E4C79C79 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D9BFC55DDD8152F06D87C9DA7D192E86FC628626 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 38F423A4320380FFE32DB60B72E7457CD6E3F096 | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
And what do you think this means to the network as a whole?
From what I understand, the 3% that was lost should eventually be distributed to the remaining relays, correct? On 02/28/2016 08:39 AM, Kurt Besig wrote:
On 2/28/2016 5:00 AM, nusenu wrote:
Looks like SG.GS stopped their guard relays. They had >3% guard probability.
+-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | Con5 | lastseen | fingerprint | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 675C5A2C2EC403B6B583735191042CF489D4E5DA | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | C3D51AAF129FED507053244ADA29353D01AD5C90 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B9B927347E005256D5D48007C38208FE8F7CC3BE | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 075A4D8D7662DF566FCE390FC820C539BFBBA867 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 53E2060F64DF258597E738FD5608D2939B92BC1D | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 963ADC0137505151C1AFA6757DD2367EDEEC7B62 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B4697BA6520A17A7F51E613018754BA5FD46D0A0 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 951BDBA042A69FE8577129EA301B027A879B985B | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D905EEADE0A40C7C0E6A8102708CF16AB8ED9A35 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 593B6169DA24F3835F0B485317C0DB529B8F3E58 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 0519D312F1BD9668B3B43751E0934911E4C79C79 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D9BFC55DDD8152F06D87C9DA7D192E86FC628626 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 38F423A4320380FFE32DB60B72E7457CD6E3F096 | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
And what do you think this means to the network as a whole?
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 28 Feb 2016, at 15:46, SuperSluether <supersluether@gmail.com> wrote:
From what I understand, the 3% that was lost should eventually be distributed to the remaining relays, correct?
Within a very short period of time, clients will use other guards. They'll try guards they have previously chosen, and try new guards if all previously chosen guards are down. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
Looks like SG.GS stopped their guard relays. They had >3% guard probability.
+-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | Con5 | lastseen | fingerprint | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 675C5A2C2EC403B6B583735191042CF489D4E5DA | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | C3D51AAF129FED507053244ADA29353D01AD5C90 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B9B927347E005256D5D48007C38208FE8F7CC3BE | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 075A4D8D7662DF566FCE390FC820C539BFBBA867 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 53E2060F64DF258597E738FD5608D2939B92BC1D | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 963ADC0137505151C1AFA6757DD2367EDEEC7B62 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | B4697BA6520A17A7F51E613018754BA5FD46D0A0 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 951BDBA042A69FE8577129EA301B027A879B985B | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D905EEADE0A40C7C0E6A8102708CF16AB8ED9A35 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 593B6169DA24F3835F0B485317C0DB529B8F3E58 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 0519D312F1BD9668B3B43751E0934911E4C79C79 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | D9BFC55DDD8152F06D87C9DA7D192E86FC628626 | | SG.GS | 2016-02-22 | 38F423A4320380FFE32DB60B72E7457CD6E3F096 | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
resumed: +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | Con5 | lastseen | fingerprint | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+ | SG.GS | 2016-03-03 | 0519D312F1BD9668B3B43751E0934911E4C79C79 | | SG.GS | 2016-03-03 | D9BFC55DDD8152F06D87C9DA7D192E86FC628626 | | SG.GS | 2016-03-03 | 675C5A2C2EC403B6B583735191042CF489D4E5DA | | SG.GS | 2016-03-03 | 951BDBA042A69FE8577129EA301B027A879B985B | | SG.GS | 2016-03-03 | 53E2060F64DF258597E738FD5608D2939B92BC1D | | SG.GS | 2016-03-03 | 38F423A4320380FFE32DB60B72E7457CD6E3F096 | +-------+------------+------------------------------------------+
participants (4)
-
Kurt Besig -
nusenu -
SuperSluether -
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor