Am Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:18:44 +0100 schrieb Klaus Layer klaus.layer@gmx.de:

Hi Klaus,

I am running two relays with the fingerprints D223399907113A1F216AAA64997BC1D4CFA8E1AC and 945CBBA599808018749DDC4EBB592168F2858C1B. For the first relay I am observing a significant usage drop down during the last 12 hours. The second runs as usual with a high throughput. I am wondering what the reason for this drop down could be. Are there any changes in the configuration of authorities? Is someone from the core TOR developers doing tests with the load distribution?

I could imagine that this behavior has something to do with the current changes / test which are still ongoing. I requested a statement from Mike just a short while ago. Stay tuned ...

Same thing here. My relay is this: http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=FCFEA91F2C897C7B2E382FF11... This must be because of the new experiments they (Mike?) is running on the network, right? I wish you guys the best of luck with your experiments. :-)

----- My blog with GPG keys, my programs etc: http://www.inshame.com Some more links: http://bit.ly/gbla4z

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Klaus Layer klaus.layer@gmx.de wrote:

Hi,

I am running two relays with the fingerprints D223399907113A1F216AAA64997BC1D4CFA8E1AC and 945CBBA599808018749DDC4EBB592168F2858C1B. For the first relay I am observing a significant usage drop down during the last 12 hours. The second runs as usual with a high throughput. I am wondering what the reason for this drop down could be. Are there any changes in the configuration of authorities? Is someone from the core TOR developers doing tests with the load distribution?

Best regards,

Klaus

---

tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays