Re: [tor-relays] Fast Exit Node Operators - ISP in US

Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:58:37 -0800 From: Seth <list@sysfu.com>
...
There are 7/12 months that have 31 days, where your 33GB per day will result in a (potential) 23GB overuse. (And that's not including non-tor traffic like OS updates.) Why not use 32GB x 31 days = 992GB, or 31GB x 31 days = 961GB ? teor pgp 0xABFED1AC hkp://pgp.mit.edu/ https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 http://0bin.net/paste/Mu92kPyphK0bqmbA#Zvt3gzMrSCAwDN6GKsUk7Q8G-eG+Y+BLpe7wt...

teor said:
The number for the RelayBandwidthRate seems on the high side as well. One thing I have noticed since I changed my configuration is I keep maxing out the 32GB and my node doesn't seem to be flagged as a Guard node. The main reason I chose port 80 is to make it available to some users that are otherwise blocked, but if the node doesn't obtain a Guard flag it seems kind of pointless to use port 80. So what is better in terms of health of the Tor Network? Current config: iptables redirects port 80 to 9001. ORPort 198.211.99.146:80 IPv4Only NoListen ORPort 198.211.99.146:9001 IPv4Only NoAdvertise AccountingMax 32 GB AccountingStart day 05:00 Proposed config change: ORPort 198.211.99.146:80 IPv4Only NoListen ORPort 198.211.99.146:9001 IPv4Only NoAdvertise AccountingMax 32 GB AccountingStart day 05:00 RelayBandwidthRate 1000 KBytes RelayBandwidthBurst 3000 KBytes Note I should actually calculate the RelayBandwidthRate for 1TB transfer, but given the stats from the past week, I think it is a reasonable rough approximation. Chuck
participants (3)
-
Chuck Peters
-
Seth
-
teor