In this morning's messages - One about three relays paid for a year in advance. “Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP. One about downloading Tor and installing it as an exit for me when I couldn't. “This issue has now been resolved. root@XXXIX:/# tor Jan 02 23:51:53.668 [notice] Tor v0.2.4.20 (git-0d50b03673670de6) running on Linux with Libevent 2.0.19-stable and OpenSSL 1.0.1c. Best Regards," Robert ____________________________________________________________ FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote:
In this morning's messages -
One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
“Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP. [snip]
I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation. It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy. When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related." My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for.
Same thing here. I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us from the start. But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR on the Crissic network." On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder@snydernet.net>wrote:
On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote:
In this morning's messages -
One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
“Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP.
[snip]
I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation. It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.
When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related." My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Please! I am not participate in this forum anymore! Any e mail that coming after this will be reported to Uk intelligence police (M15) Be aware pls with all posts or e mails here ! Have a nice weekend to all
On 12 Jan 2014, at 20:51, I <beatthebastards@inbox.com> wrote:
It is Crissic I was referring to. I've been caught by several similarly. But I can say that a couple have quietly let it go on after I put some argument taken from Jacob, Roger, and others of the real legal status of nodes and Tor's real value. Some say Tor's good but the business rejects it from its model.
If we all keep stating the facts each time individually we must build the collective impression that people using their own money for privacy and against tyranny (Ayatollah/NSA same same) are reliable and a not real problem and to be accomodated.
CPU use level is the one I can't control. That may effect the other slices of server but getting them on Tor's side might bring some tolerance. I asked them to limit the resources to my VPS which gained some ground and an offer of further help.
Note the second anecdote wherein the VPS business went to the trouble of downloading and installing Tor when I couldn't.
I feel Tor is getting to a critical mass not to far away. Angela Merkel might be looking at using it.
Robert
Same thing here. I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us from the start. But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR on the Crissic network."
One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
“Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP. [snip]
I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation. It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.
When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related." My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for. _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Please! I am not participate in this forum anymore! Any e mail that coming after this will be reported to Uk intelligence police (M15) Be aware pls with all posts or e mails here ! Have a nice weekend to all
On 12 Jan 2014, at 18:30, Richard Budd <rotorbudd@gmail.com> wrote:
Same thing here. I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us from the start. But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR on the Crissic network."
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder@snydernet.net> wrote:
On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote: In this morning's messages -
One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
“Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP. [snip]
I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation. It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.
When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related." My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Please! Every mail on this list, including every mail that you just sent, contains a link at the bottom that you can use to unsubscribe, and you'll never ever receive any emails from this list again! Have a nice weekend On 1/18/14 8:11 AM, Fabiano London wrote:
Please! I am not participate in this forum anymore! Any e mail that coming after this will be reported to Uk intelligence police (M15) Be aware pls with all posts or e mails here ! Have a nice weekend to all
On 12 Jan 2014, at 18:30, Richard Budd <rotorbudd@gmail.com> wrote:
Same thing here. I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us from the start. But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR on the Crissic network."
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder@snydernet.net> wrote:
On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote: In this morning's messages -
One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
“Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP. [snip]
I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation. It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.
When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related." My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
participants (5)
-
Fabiano London -
I -
Karsten Loesing -
Richard Budd -
Steve Snyder