Kurt, We are both on OVH but I am on the FRA side, yet my graph seems much more steady (and I have more flags than you), despite having slightly less bandwidth and slightly less uptime. Is your server being hammered by something or in use somewhere else? My similar node: E08CD0147F9DC5C2383B84D8C052FE9A83DAFB4B
On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:30 PM, Kurt Besig kbesig@socal.rr.com wrote:
E65D300F11E1DB12C534B0146BDAB6972F1A8A48
On 22 Sep 2017, at 08:34, Dylan Issa dylan@fdylan.co.uk wrote:
Kurt, We are both on OVH but I am on the FRA side, yet my graph seems much more steady (and I have more flags than you), despite having slightly less bandwidth and slightly less uptime. Is your server being hammered by something or in use somewhere else? My similar node: E08CD0147F9DC5C2383B84D8C052FE9A83DAFB4B
On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:30 PM, Kurt Besig kbesig@socal.rr.com wrote:
E65D300F11E1DB12C534B0146BDAB6972F1A8A48
I have relays at OVH in both FR and CA. I saw a similar difference when I deployed them, and when I update them.
I think this is because OVH's connectivity in FR is better, and it's closer to more of the Tor network (and more of the bandwidth authorities).
But my CA relay also has less bandwidth, so that affects how long it takes to regain flags, too.
T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n ------------------------------------------------------------------------
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org