-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 15:44, tagnaq wrote:
Yes, design work related to IPv6 support will bring multiple ORPort support if I recall correct, but this wont prevent circuits to fail in firewalled scenarios because your Tor process doesn't know that outbound traffic going to port 443 is filtered and a client using your node doesn't know that you are not able to connect to relays running on ORPort 443.
I guess tor.conf could have a directive as "never connect to this port". I know my situation is a bit particular, I fully realize, though. Anyway, I am tunneling quite a bit of traffic, so I hope I am being useful, even if not useful to everybody. With your comments I am afraid that I could be punishing the network because people trying to go thru me could be unable to create some circuits in an silent way, bringing connection delays and a general sense of unrealibility. I accept suggestions. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:jcea@jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ . _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQCVAwUBTejn4plgi5GaxT1NAQKTogQAm83IPATnMMfCVlrgHbqvmluzi3va7htC MyRNgSj8H+1fkWDLzbyWGce1FIT9XW91m0uqItzwJ38sx2IQxs0k1BrFfhmn/fuA bu04QiNhVchEg57jj72fowm1oQHLGE0C6FKrXSPhMRNkGZyokPlvMok+6+r6gCYO 2eUnR/GrzvM= =F0hk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----