Thanks for the link to consensus-health, based data available:
05/11 17:00 longclaw=4540 gabelmoo=4170 moria1=4410 faravahar=2520 => cons: 4170
05/11 18:00 longclaw=4550 gabelmoo=*2170* moria1=4410 faravahar=2520 => cons: *2520*
So that explains the drop.
Seb
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 at 13:40 teor teor2345@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 Nov. 2016, at 23:32, r1610091651 r1610091651@telenet.be wrote:
The previous drops, i know why they happened (related to server
unavailability) so I know the cause. For 5th however I have no clue.
As far as I can tell, the relay is accurately measured.
Sometimes, this means that you get a lower measurement than you might have had before.
Accurate bandwidth measurements are a good thing for tor users, even if the changes in the measurement are sometimes (temporarily) disappointing to relay operators.
If you want to improve the measurements, try adding more bandwidth. For your relay, this means increasing BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst.
T
-- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays