-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello. I'm surprised that the memory savings are so great. Note that Debian Trixie does not have mimalloc2, only mimalloc3. Did you find out what caused mimalloc3 to lose so many of the savings that you got with mimalloc2? Perhaps there are some runtime configuration tweaks that could be used to adjust its behavior, if the "regression" is purely a matter of different defaults being used. For jemalloc, have you considered giving mozjemalloc a try? It has a number of security improvements that jemalloc lacks. I'm also curious if there are any glibc tunables that can be used to improve its memory. See "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --list-tunables" for a list of supported tunables. Perhaps setting the correct choice of MALLOC_ARENA_MAX or MALLOC_MMAP_THRESHOLD would help? With that said, I'm not a fan of the use of LLMs in that write-up. It makes me constantly question the accuracy of the claims that are made (although I can and will test them myself). I'd much rather a detailed write-up in English with non-native fluency than fluent AI slop. Regards, forest -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQQtr8ZXhq/o01Qf/pow+TRLM+X4xgUCaWBOlgAKCRAw+TRLM+X4 xmq0AQCFG+8aspitBFzKpvgSTTZzaGV4OYehfFAAXU3tqkFtvgD/SFn49LYdyIbq JF1nFLLEmBmEBmALPArRsHLB035o7gI= =giFe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----