-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Geoff Down:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013, at 12:35 AM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
I've put binary .debs[1] up of the latest Tor experimental version - 0.2.4.16-rc - which are built for the Raspberry Pi. I only have a few days of test data, but so far it appears to perform much better than 0.2.3.x.
Sorry to be the ghost at the feast, but should people trust your binaries?
That's up to them - I am who I am, currently just an independent hobbyist, so that's an individual decision for them to make. However, it would be nice for me to also put the instructions[1] for building on your own Pi (or any machine) into the Github repo as well.
Also, I've never heard "ghost at the feast" before - is that from a specific country? :)
Not that I know anything about Github, so am prepared to be proved wrong: are these a deterministic build from published source?
They're what popped out when I followed the build-from-source instructions[1] on the Pi, using the deb-src packages for 0.2.4.16-rc from the Tor experimental repo with no other modifications - in fact, I think I probably should have put a minor version name on them to avoid being "upgraded over" with ARMv7 packages for people who have the experimental Tor repo in their sources.list, but I'm not sure about that yet.
Nothing personal, just reflecting the ethos of the list I think.
No worries, it is what it is - people who don't like the idea of downloading binaries from some random dude can see the following link.
[1] https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en#source
Best, - -Gordon M.