True, about 40 Exits as of my count yesterday...
The back of that medal - concentration on only a few big providers gets resolved that way :-)
Paul
Am 09.10.2016 um 11:57 schrieb Markus Koch:
Thats really really bad news. Over 400 Digitalocean relays out there :(
Markus
2016-10-09 11:44 GMT+02:00 pa011 pa011@web.de:
OK further bad news, Exit shut down by DO yesterday. Here the latest statement from them:
"Additionally, we are not allowing further TOR exit nodes on our infrastructure - they generate a large amount of abuse, are used for various illegal activities, and attract a large number of DDoS attacks.
You're more than welcome to run bridges, obfs proxies, and relays, but running an exit node is at your own risk, and sufficient abuse may result in suspension of service."
Am 08.10.2016 um 05:00 schrieb Alecks Gates:
I'm running on DO as well with the reduced exit policy and have had about five complaints in 2 months. DO certainly appears to be getting less and less happy. I'm glad to know it's not just me, though.
Hopefully a curated list of IPs to reject will help a lot. Thanks for the link to tornull.
Exit Node fingerprints: E553AC1CA05365EA218D477C2FF4C48986919D07 889550CB9C98CF172CB977AA942B77E9759056C2
Alecks
On 10/07/2016 07:04 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:16:39AM +0200, Markus Koch wrote:
2016-10-08 0:09 GMT+02:00 Tristan supersluether@gmail.com:
This page has 3 policies: Reduce exit policy, reduced-reduced exit policy, and a lightweight example policy.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
On Oct 7, 2016 5:01 PM, "Markus Koch" niftybunny@googlemail.com wrote: > > reduced-reduced exit policy. ? > > Illuminate me, pls. >
Thank you both!
Will try https://tornull.org. Perhaps it helps.
Markus
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays