On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:16:39AM +0200, Markus Koch wrote:
2016-10-08 0:09 GMT+02:00 Tristan <supersluether@gmail.com>:
This page has 3 policies: Reduce exit policy, reduced-reduced exit policy, and a lightweight example policy.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
On Oct 7, 2016 5:01 PM, "Markus Koch" <niftybunny@googlemail.com> wrote:
reduced-reduced exit policy. ?
Illuminate me, pls.
Thank you both!
Will try https://tornull.org. Perhaps it helps.
Markus
I spotchecked a few of the rejects on the list. Spamhaus returned a page showing only [0][1][2][3]: Error SH-403-001 Are all of those tornull rejects legit? Another one I checked said: "Network operated by cybercriminals, providing services to spammers and botnet operators. Can't trust anything originating from AS59564." And that came from [4]: "Upstream Adjacent AS list AS3255 UARNET-AS State Enterprise Scientific and Telecommunication Centre "Ukrainian Academic and Research Network" of the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine (UARNet),UA" I worry about blindly following a list of rejected subnets. I won't argue that it's not safer for the exit operator, but I hope someone's cross-checking and confirming each entry is needed. [0] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL113323 [1] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL169644 [2] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL300589 [3] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL310432 [4] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL244638