On Monday, March 9, 2015 3:33pm, "grarpamp" grarpamp@gmail.com said:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Markus Hitter mah@jump-ing.de wrote:
Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder:
Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g. gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a big step forward in curbing spam. This would allow the exit operation to refuse traffic to the webmail service while stilling allowing access to the parent presence.
Good point!
Two censors high five-ing themselves over ways to ban entire peoples freedom to communicate using webmail. Amazing. Yet you do not call your ISP demanding they block your webmail for the same and greater spam reason. I hear internets is bad, you should ban it too. Please die from clue bat first.
I my mind such a capability would be optional, like opening POP3 and IMAP ports are today. Thus *your* relay could support all services while someone with a more timid ISP could still run an exit node, albeit an exit node that is less useful than yours.