Interesting...
Don't exit nodes with equal bandwidth have equal chance of being utilised on a circuit? Why is your US exit being utilised more?
Looking at the map, I thought Canada could do with a few more exits?
Should geo diversity be related to numbers of internet users in that country? Ie, Canada, ~1/2 population of UK, so should run approximately 1/2 as many exits at least? Or am I overthinking this?
Are there other legal advantages to running an exit node in another country? Such as choosing a country with which your own country has no extradition laws? In case something really bad happened.
Regards,
C
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Sec INT sec.int9@gmail.com wrote:
Ive got exits in the US, France ,Finland (dead) and Bulgaria but its v difficult to find any exit providers in the Far East - I have relays in Bangalore and Singapore (which gets hit pretty hard) but if you do find a provider out East let us know
P.s Bangalore is under utilised - 60mb/s but has barely used up 1Gb in 2 weeks a as oppsed to US exit which is doing 1TB a day now at 60mb/s with a 1000 connections most of the time
We are supposed to go for geo diversity but usuage remains low for me in more isolated areas e.g Bangalore,Africa
regards
Mark B
On 8 Dec 2016, at 09:53, Chris Adams chris@chrisada.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I want to start up another exit node. I have a few choices for which
country it's in. I currently live in a country with quite a high exit node/population density.
Are there any advantages to distributing nodes around the globe in terms
of performance/privacy?
Are there some countries where you definitely shouldn't run exit nodes?
(Censored internet is an obvious example)
C _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays