Am 06.12.2016 um 18:16 schrieb Rana:
-----Original Message----- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of pa011 Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:24 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP
I would like to hear about ONE Raspi Tor operator who was allowed by DirAuths (or bwauths or whatever) to come even near 1 mbit/s bandwidth utilization
let me tell: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AA44C4BE3C90DCAAC09E5CD26150710AAA80D5... https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CA9A5D5C4688F04EEC1AF810B0FD348109FA17...
are sharing the same dynamic IP on a Rasp2 -cut every 24 hours
day rx | tx | total | avg. rate ------------------------+-------------+-------------+--------------- 05.12.2016 27,20 GiB | 28,39 GiB | 55,59 GiB | 5,40 Mbit/sthat is slight above 1 Mbit/s :-)
Best regards
Paul
Wow nice bandwidth you are pushing through Paul! You mean two Raspi 2's sharing an Internet connection, each relaying 27 Gbytes per day at 5.4 Mbit/s on the average?? Total 10.8 Mbit/s?? Or 2.7 Mbit/s each?
It is just 1 single Rasp2 - running 2 tor instances on 1 IP, details here https://gitweb.torproject.org/debian/tor.git/tree/debian/tor-instance-create...
Definitely refutes the previously claimed 1 Mbit/s Tor limit on Raspi, and means that Raspi has nothing to do with the ridiculously low utilization of my relay, just as I thought. As a matter of fact this means that whoever is NOT running a relay on a Raspi (or two, or four of them) is wasting money, unless he has a computer lying about with nothing better to do.
Also, what's the max memory and CPU utilization on your Raspi (I have read somewhere that Tor is only capable of utilizing 2 of the 4 CPU cores), and what kind of Internet connection do you have?
The Rasp2 is fairly unused, in memory and CPU - running on a German DSL - giving tested max. 7Mbit/s upload
top - 19:15:15 up 47 days, 1:11, 2 users, load average: 0,37, 0,26, 0,24 Tasks: 118 total, 2 running, 116 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 10,3 us, 1,9 sy, 0,0 ni, 86,4 id, 0,0 wa, 0,0 hi, 1,4 si, 0,0 st KiB Mem: 947756 total, 831368 used, 116388 free, 147964 buffers KiB Swap: 102396 total, 0 used, 102396 free. 426736 cached Mem
BTW the $35 Raspi 3 has 33% more CPU power than your Raspi 2 and the same amount of memory.
There is no need for a Rasp3 under given condition - not even the Rasp2 is getting warm :-)
Rana