23 May
2012
23 May
'12
8:23 a.m.
On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:21:46 -0500 Jon torance.ca@gmail.com allegedly wrote:
The port was 57734 - of course that doesn't mean another port could be used
That looks like a source port to me. In my case, the (allegedly) attacked ports were 80, so clearly webservers.
Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- blog: baldric.net fingerprint: E8D2 8882 F7AE DEB7 B2AA 9407 B9EA 82CC 1092 7423 ---------------------------------------------------------------------