On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:34:19 +0000, Aeris wrote: ...
And there is also an hardware bottleneck, because every components (mainly ethernet & SD card here) are connected to the same physical USB controller limited to 480Mbps for *overall* transfer (network + disk + others USB).
Which isn't that small. tor does not do disk (or 'other'), and 25MByte/s is quite a lot - more than I can push with big iron due to traffic limits.
...
No no, GB. 128GB is usual on server. We even begin to see 1TB RAM machine.
You mean 'this is what you usually get as a server machine', not 'this is what tor typically uses, right?
Andreas