On 5 Oct 2016, at 18:10, oconor@email.cz oconor@email.cz wrote:
We're back to IPS, which can drop the specific malicious traffic. I've been speaking with the lawyer few minutes ago. He told me that there is a pressure to put all the responsibility for the traffic to the ISPs. Well ... what are the ISPs most probably going to do ... ? They can ban all tor exit nodes, or they will force the owners to clear the traffic.
When you're worried about being accused, why you don't use fake information during registration and payments with bitcoins? Then you can also filter the traffic by IPS ... and everybory will be happy.
There are a few things wrong with your suggested solution: * it's really, really hard to stay anonymous on the Internet as an individual, and impossible for many corporations (it's hard to be transparent about how you spend money as a charity, and be anonymous at the same time), * if all Tor Exit Nodes are anonymous, ISPs may block them more, not less, * filtering will likely get your Exit marked as a BadExit, * IPS aren't perfect - they let some unwanted traffic through, and block other traffic that is totally ok.
Tim
What should a tor exit op do? Ban the user? exits get the traffic from middle nodes and we cant tell (by design) who anyone is. We can block ips but that is not really helping with bots who tries to find vulnerabilities and scan large blocks.
markus
Sent from my iPad
On 4 Oct 2016, at 23:55, oconor@email.cz oconor@email.cz wrote:
If I understand that well ... if tor operator is avare, that his tor node is used for illegal activity (when their ISP told them about that) and he's not going to do anything abou that, he wont be guity by complicity?
On 04.10.16 22:37, oconor@email.cz wrote:
Tor and IPS has both it's own nature and you shouldn't be punished, if your intension was just to filter the bad traffic.
And who is to decide what constitutes "bad traffic"? I am not a lawyer, but in Germany one of the cornerstones of not being held responsible for traffic passing through a Tor node is § 8 of the Telemediengesetz: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tmg/__8.html -- sometimes referred to colloquially as the "provider privilege".
One only is free of responsibility if one neither initiates a transfer, nor selects the transfer's destination, nor selects or modifies the transmitted data. That's what "passing through" means.
According to two lawyers I spoke to, exit policies might already be borderline breaking these rules for exit nodes, but the technical basis at least guarantees that traffic will never reach an exit node that does not let it pass. Now think of a firewall that interferes with transfers once the data has already reached the exit node. Wouldn't you agree that this means selecting/modifiying the transmitted data?
That's just one national law that I am aware of, I imagine other countries have similar regulations in place. Any internet service provider interfering with net neutrality risks lawsuits, because it is not an ISP's prerogative to decide what traffic is "good" or "bad".
-Ralph _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays = _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
T
-- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org