You're saying that you're on a 1Gbit/s link, but you are only allowed to use 100Mbit/s. Is this averaged over some timescale? If so, you could try and play around with the 'RelayBandwidthBurst' setting. Increasing the Burst might help reduce the queue delay when you're near saturation, assuming the traffic is not constant and you're not over-saturated most of the time.
I don't know the measuring system, but I doubt that random packet dropping with iptables will have a noticeable effect on the measured bandwidth, as long as you don't drop enough packets to horribly degrade user experience.
Am 02.10.2015 um 10:16 schrieb Dhalgren Tor:
"So" indeed. For the time that was under discussion:
cell-stats-end 2015-10-02 00:28:54 (86400 s) cell-processed-cells 20220,420,72,18,8,4,1,1,1,1 cell-queued-cells 2.00,0.25,0.01,0.00,0.09,0.10,0.02,0.00,0.00,0.00 cell-time-in-queue 203,131,17,7,2832,6198,3014,802,21,26 cell-circuits-per-decile 126717
. . .horrible
On 10/1/15, Yawning Angel yawning@schwanenlied.me wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:05:38 +0000 Dhalgren Tor dhalgren.tor@gmail.com wrote:
- observing that statistics show elevated cell-queuing delays when
the relay has been in the saturated state, e.g.
cell-queued-cells 2.59,0.11,0.01,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00 cell-time-in-queue 107,25,3,3,4,3,7,4,1,7
So?
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays