-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Good point. I should have thought better about phrasing my opinion as labeling the lists as simply shitty might be a bit blindsighted. Listing whole ranges though seems to do more damage than good in most cases, certainly when no proper delisting policy is in place.
On 5/21/15 10:46 PM, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 21/05/15 22:35 +0200 - Tim Semeijn:
The lists of SECTOOR might be used wrongly but they sound like they belong to the ever growing list of 'shitty blacklists'. In my work for
In my personal opinion: you are barking at the wrong tree. It's your freedom to create a list of whatever you like with whatever criteria you please and name it whatever it makes you feel good. And yes, of course, it is your freedom to label one more of those lists as "shitty blacklists".
Point is: I don't think there is such a thing as a shitty blacklist. In the end it's up to the administrator of a server to use or not to use a list.
And yes, I am aware some issues may arise if one of thoses lists has a large user base (as, in that case, the compiler of that list may (ab)use that power). It's not that I am 100% in favor of these lists. :)
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
- -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8A4DDF