Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped you. I'm on too many email lists and things get buried sometimes, so I didn't see any of your original requests. I had a few minutes today where I could have chatted with you on IRC and worked things out, maybe.
Instead I gave you a pithy short reply, because that's all your attitude deserves.
Take it as a life lesson (or not, I don't really care that much) but you'll get a lot more support from people if you don't act like an entitled jerk who deserves other peoples' time and expertise for free.
On 2015-12-04 10:21, Kurt Besig wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote:
Looks like you got more than you paid for. On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote: That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on a new VPS relay.. That's pathetic. Thanks for all your input.
Yeah, that's the kind of useful answer that has made this list so popular...thanks for the response. >> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays [1] _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays [1]
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays [1]
Links: ------ [1] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays