Ah I see, thanks for taking the time investigating this. If there is something I need to do to help, please let me know.
On 21.01.2015 01:22 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/15 11:54, Network Operations Center wrote:
My dropping consensus overlaps exactly with the blue line on that graph time-wise. The 1 Month Graph shows this pretty well.
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F26...
It feels as if I am almost completely dependent on that blue node, although since one needs multiple measures, it shouldn't be possible.
Ah, sorry for being unclear. The blue line is not bandwidth authority number 4, it's the number of relays for which there are measurements from 4 bandwidth authorities.
But here's another graph, specifically for your relay schokomilch:
https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/schokomilch-cw-2015-01-21.pn...
14C1 is tor26, 4901 is maatuska, and D586 is moria1. It looks like maatuska stopped measuring your relay between December 29 and January 5, which is a general problem with maatuska's scanner, not specific to your relay, AFAIK.
And unrelated to this, neither gabelmoo nor longclaw ever measured your relay. I'd say this is something to investigate and then fix.
All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUv5oBAAoJEJd5OEYhk8hIqgkIAKE82nkthE5OEIGxBtgtqKdd cB8Kq2BdgGSq6kYi7CF6EclJuc7mhEBHkfhYiWTyCE/yhXyg7hFkyiL3rr9qGVtE gBxoJqX8OgmdoV9c74Ao83qU130SQ4BArYgFwqmC64tvSpe4jl6tiFddndF5MomC 4YH0Nuw6VnxUTPcG2ZiRjab5sZcpJ4YLJzBmbjB1oXRy2UaRQOTT2o1Cz65fBIt3 4lCW9lMTfxn4G3JUEO2Pj1rTgyoKM3U7spv/IdyrmQmK+wwzKCDRIxkWAIDbM2Rw lOEwNz3rodsIksgyZk/oOPA/NiJUaKEWKX7DR2D2rBhCIuRamV6np1b5oE2uRjU= =BhVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays