Thanks all! Keeping it as a bridge sounds good to me. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Sasikantha babu <sasikanthbabu@yahoo.com> wrote:
2 weeks is short period for a bridge, I think it would be the same for relay too.
I've an EC2 bridge and mid-reply(at home) up for almost 2 months. Initially the usage is almost none on bridge, not even 500MB for 50 days, and advertised bandwidth is reported as 50-60KB/s. At one point I too had considered converting EC2 bridge to mid-relay because of no usage but I did not do that and decided to run 1 more month. After 50 days bridge got a guard flag and usage is pretty much good (last 4 days - 18GB-Rx 18GB-Tx) . The advertised bandwidth is now at 500KB/s.
There is nothing like unused bridge. So I would suggest you to wait for some more time.
PS: I'm actually considering to convert my mid-relay at home to a bridge. :)
Thanks Sasi
On Wednesday, 11 February 2015 3:33 AM, Elliott Jin < elliott.jin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I've had an EC2 bridge <https://globe.torproject.org/#/bridge/FD0814BDD15B2E591B04868B988D87FC6D331D2A> up for 2 weeks, and it seems to have gotten no usage. I'm considering converting it into a middle relay instead, but before I do so, I'm just wondering:
- Is there value in having a marginal unused bridge "in reserve"? - Is this value greater than that of an active middle relay?
Thanks! -Elliott
-- Anonymous Feedback <http://www.admonymous.com/eyjin>
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-- Anonymous Feedback <http://www.admonymous.com/eyjin>