Why? People say 'DO NOT MESS WITH TRAFFIC' but in the same breath they say 'BUT USE A CACHING DNS RESOLVER'.
This is an internally inconsistent attitude, and is not consistent with how large scale operations function either. Tools like varnish, CDN's, memcache, dns caching, etc are all common - and best - practices.
If there's a practical consideration I am missing, that's different.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Nusenu BM-2D8wMEVgGvY76je1WXNPfo8SrpZt5yGHES@bitmessage.ch wrote:
hi,
eric gisse:
I even threw on a squid proxy on regular http and that's caching something like 5-10% of all requests and overall http bandwidth.
Are you saying you are routing exit traffic through a transparent squid http proxy?
If that is the case, please do not interfere with exit traffic in any way.
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays