Hi,
On 8. Apr 2021, at 14:50, David Goulet dgoulet@torproject.org wrote: On 07 Apr (21:43:50), Toralf Förster wrote:
On 4/7/21 9:04 PM, David Goulet wrote:
Over time, we will remove or add more relays at each minor release if the set of fallback directories not working reaches a 25% threshold or more.
In the past a fallback dir volunteer committed himself to have address and port stable for 2 years.
If a relay is now removed from the fallback directory list - how long shall the Tor relay operator wait before he can change the address and/or port?
No more requirements of such anymore. By selecting Stable and relays that have been around for a while, the theory is that the majority of relays of the selected list will be stable as in same address and port.
I do hope that overall in the network most relays do not change port/address often as relay stability is pivotal to an healthy network. But if so, our monitoring of the fallback directories will trigger an alert once too many relays are not working anymore as fallback and so we'll issue a new list.
Do we have some metrics in place to spot whether this improves/degrades bootstrapping performance and how it develops over time?
Cheers Sebastian