I have nothing against this proposal although im not sure it would be that much efficient. Especially, how does it make relay operations 'less sustainable' or 'more risky'?
@Imre Jonk: why would you want - and why should you have - an higher probability? Sounds to me the ideal case is an infinite amount of independent exits with an almost-zero probability.
C
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:28 AM Felix zwiebel@quantentunnel.de wrote:
Hi nusenu
Thank's you for your encouraging efforts to keep things safe.
Am 05.07.2020 um 18:35 schrieb nusenu:
To prevent this from happening over and over again I'm proposing two simple but to some extend effective relay requirements to make malicious relay operations more expensive, time consuming, less sustainable and more risky for such actors
Is an issue real or not? Any answer to that question does not contradict a substantial method. Right, the proposed measure is not against sneek-in attackers but it buys time to detect and tackle sudden issues. Let's move forward. I hear you.
-- Cheers, Felix _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays