The thing is, with this setup arm and also vidalia reported "can not bind 0.0.0.0:443. Thats why I went back to the old setting. For the moment I do not really care, because it works, I was just wondering.
My router forwards 443 to 192.168.1.12:9001. So you suggest I put "192.168.1.12" instead of "0.0.0.0.", right?
Sorry there is an error in my example, forgot the NoAdvertise attribute didn't notice till the mail came back through the list, should have been
DirPort 80 NoListen DirPort 127.0.0.1:9030 NoAdvertise
Other than that the rest all should work as I suggested either specify the actual address your router is set to forward to or specify only the port.
On 10/03/13 17:20, Matt Joyce wrote:
There is no need to actually write out the IPv4 unspecified address in the config file (0.0.0.0), all you need to do is just put:
ORPort 9001 NoAdvertise
Admittedly I have not actually tried it with ORPort personally but I have had that configuration on one of my relays in the past for DirPort to enable tor to advertise directory on 80 which was already assigned to apache2, then apache simply reverse proxied requests for /tor/* to tor on localhost 9030. However, while you can do the above to listen on any address there is no need to do so, I would instead specify the address and port you have set in the DNAT rule on your router. Same when I had the reverse proxy setup I simply had it set like:
DirPort 80 NoListen DirPort 127.0.0.1:9030
Course in your case it wont be 127.0.0.1 because it is coming in from your external router not another server on the local machine.
On 10/03/13 16:18, Sina Eetezadi wrote:
Hi!
I want to have port 443 advertised but listen on port 9001. My router then forwards 443->9001 to the machine tor is running on.
It works with this: ORport 433 ORListenAddress 0.0.0.0:9001
However I thought this is deprecated and I rather use:
ORport 443 NoListen ORPort 0.0.0.0:9001 NoAdvertise
The latter however does not seem to work. Arm for example still errors "binding failed" and I see no incoming connections.
Is this a bug?
Thanks.
SE _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays