-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
I'd recommend fail2ban or equivalent instead.
Right, thanks. I planned on mentioning SSH-protecting daemons, but forgot. I've had better luck with SSHGuard, but fail2ban is the most common option. On 11/18/2014 11:45 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> wrote:
On 11/18/2014 04:28 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
People should realize though that it is not 'safer' in any way running SSH on another port.
But it is (slightly) more expensive - which counts, or ?
In my limited experience, moving SSH to another port made no apparent difference to the number of random attempts to break in. I'd recommend fail2ban or equivalent instead.
zw _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUa4xDAAoJELxHvGCsI27Nd9UP/2sXNuxrmhcgii45VX+Jj17l 3XFMyCd4bT9gSyjVeO6TKaLsnWZaiIGkZq6P0HfzRylfKfaPCsSTvbV1kTTcrWKo LMQCmJIEmYHll6yCwfW/yWNFWhBiKSs8zccynw/hDXtKg0aN0ibWFUIF0jfV8O/R npu5JsDMbf98O+oJ08Y3lWH54z7fzsPzisvlERu+Q3exUDErlOBsENPyt6IlAe7k mrij/5xd3hed3LcMepWZyV1JGB4yEfQYa5Kx06O4wQ9by4uuhNV/Y1P2qLXUhzX3 Sx7ZrYzSXP3gsgr6icItxf4sWLZMLcdQxnvdGY8x9SWWh8w8GzTHqQvnwFGr06H+ tjmYuHbowgFjHaFxKal362UiJRNxFBZSExuV4RcTX3Nt4bmdTTQNfBZAZHMpKyay XVX7dIMhs6oNa9q+PxmBFCXvn5cK25i36TrnDQU1JdMo6YQf6wkbgctRwTqiVlA+ V0OE9dSQVMsp5GlCOJhAYFYEdE8A+kTJq3hZjfzrlE00GX5bjcCHz/m0Srty3gU/ hvzRe+CzbinIKowwlvljfbU7xaQbo2XYspdSHw3sIuhuyRTMJYp5ToXI2n71w/ED eU1lALWKIN9UM2kf/oMOJYWRzkOazwnav9pb1NVTfeqD+DC8uDrAJt5zYzkGdOfh 1J6gjitEaUxhZENrlPlH =iUZD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----