-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/23/2017 03:10 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
One note, 9.9.9.10 does no filtering, but sadly also doesn't enforce DNSSEC. It has the same privacy policy and similar. The former is good, the later not a problem, b/c DNSSEC validation has to be made by the client nevertheless.
I do persoanlly use 9.9.9.10 together with dnsmasq (whihc does the DNSSEC job) at my desktop b/c I couldn't get DNSSEC woring with the DNS servs of my ADSL provider here in Hamburg. - -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWhcSCRccdG9yYWxmLmZv ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTjRxAPwMNZQCFk7av7cyMbRCjCyqIPq4 91jnvwX6lLXnL9bEywEAhaZgeF3oFKvRENSMJls/NeSHm/jfCXGjrQ/0/yaGChQ= =zma+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----