On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:34:13 -0700 Andy Isaacson adi@hexapodia.org allegedly wrote:
If only there were a separate TCP port for HTTP-with-Porn and all the pornographers used it, then an exit policy for "HTTP-without-porn" would be possible. But alas, we don't even have vague agreement on what constitutes porn, much less a social contract requiring all pornographers to segregate their traffic for our convenience.
RFC6969, Pornographic HTTP. #ideasforapril1
Wonderful! Love it. (I have often pondered the possibility of a DPI "porn filter" which rejects traffic based on the "proportion of flesh coloured packets to the total" or some such nonsense. Second order problem - define "flesh coloured".)
Best
Mick ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------