On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx jon@csail.mit.edu wrote:
I'm not sure if this was meant as a technical or aesthetic preference, but I am curious. Is there any technical benefit to rounning a more diverse set of opensource oprating systems for tor nodes? I discount closed source as we don't know what's going on in there.
Would that present significantly different attack surfaces? I can imagine a vulnerability in the TCP stack or other kernel functionality in Linux would not be the saem in FreeBSD or vice versa...
My nodes are currently Ubuntu but if there's a reason to do so I coould possibly switch OS to FreeBSD (or hurd does tor run on hurd :))
These surface differences result in real world immunities. If all you're running is one thing, and that one thing gets cracked, it's over. This happens all the time. And it's not just the kernel, it's also the differences in libraries, etc. So yes, for that purpose regarding the Tor network, don't pick Linux or Windows. If you want to play and learn something new and not closed source, pick one of the BSD's... free, open, dfly, net. FreeBSD is the obvious general choice, the others will subject you to more specific challenges.
4796 Linux 1650 Windows 294 FreeBSD 75 Darwin 35 OpenBSD 9 NetBSD 4 Bitrig 2 SunOS 2 GNU/kFreeBSD 2 DragonFly