So far I have had no abuse emails or complaints after two months on a new server, using the longer suggested reduced policy list, but I do exclude 80, which seems safer but limits the role as an exit. But 443 open. I closed other potential abuse ports such as 22, 8080, 5900.
It's not the complaints that worry me, but the reaction of the ISP with any complaints, so best avoided until I can afford to be my own ISP.
What are the risks of abuse reports in opening up a wide range of high port numbers as an exit say 20,000-50,000?
Gerry
-----Original Message----- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Cristian Consonni Sent: 12 October 2017 11:10 To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)
Hi Paul,
On 11/10/2017 13:28, Paul Templeton wrote:
I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider
I will
For my experience, I do the same.
There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general consensus seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble than it's worth. https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-October/013188 .html
I'll drop port 22
You may be interested in these Reduced Exit Policies: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
there are several of them which are progressively strictest and stricter.
Cristian _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays