Daniel Thill dgt@acm.org writes:
Can a single tor daemon instance provide both non-obfuscated and various other obfuscated transports? Right now, I have one instance that provides both obfs3 and scramblesuit. E.g.,
ServerTransportPlugin obfs3,scramblesuit exec /usr/local/bin/obfsproxy managed ServerTransportListenAddr obfs3 MYIP:PORT ServerTransportListenAddr scramblesuit MYIP:PORT2
I currently have another tor instance that runs a vanilla bridge configuration (no transports) on a different port. Is this really necessary? I couldn't find any documentation that address this. Can
It shouldn't be necessary.
Obfuscated bridges are vanilla bridges by default (they expose an ORPort).
[ As a matter of fact, this is a problem since it means that bridges are vulnerable to active probing by default. Please see this ticket https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7349 . Unfortunately, this problem will likely not be fixed in the short-term future. ]
non-transport clients use any bridge by simply not negotiating a transport? There is a "none" pluggable transport type, but I figured that was for debugging purposes.
Thanks, Dan
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays