-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:27 PM, David Serrano <tor@dserrano5.es> wrote: Throwing this idea out there instead of keeping it to myself: what about modifying the form to ask also for the destination port? So the investigator would enter source IP, dest port and date. Can be somewhat confusing due to the source/dest mix, but the "Exit" column in this case would be pretty clear because it would refer only to the required port. I actually quite like this idea, I think that could work. Anyone else have an opinion on this? Joshua Lee Tucker @tuckerwales -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVnCQvCRB1zCF5iNk2lwAAgbUQAMGDJXpWR790PofLtztI HZx96jpFHlBZ8VUrPntstDhFApFvNes9AdSKgIv9CTQ4T2M8C9gckI7RSvWb 0Es30mRjcAYEwey0tBAPRKupzV7TwQ50ol1c6TCKv83KDe1UskV5BoGj8d6k BkrL6HuCPXi7Gi9qOUvMmPkEdkoehMBiBuqvxO3tRh//SRoabdMDsVpYVFBN cPIHd0xrrSC8w7T3OcExKyxEUKg1pfAtuUkFHrZ3v8YoVfVKLvGda56p2i1G LGVAQ4DmT2SZ6kwZq1OXb8ZOKUQR/wo6xXGIK8jWHHl88chaD0wZoQOTH475 8gA9dho/xOyb5HntFD/R5/LZ/m8PZoVm4tKFL92Gk6rIdOOZz52WZlEtCFfW p2IjkBHB5EyrW01i05PbcHRM7NVQUZKGQ2i1CNPCFgYqa1t8VpD1cpQzx+vG +Bl8rrJgSPAB/acDiVsb/kRylTFVXb8BvNuXAezFMG+2qAUZY3Eob5Ipp4vc MeIgN31xOtspwyfb3ba5nOiP5gb+xZuZxvHkOCTDpztCY/MbZYFtw80rjhPy 8uDXoFfLO1kG80hlISJp/XSRmUm55sZGp838P/K4UTnG1popR8uhp61kgnwR 3wWTtanu2tfTqBXqt4bk1Ml5F6nPPLlPs+W40zAt/4YF0vQtVU6peeN0d8Tk fBg6 =jw3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:27 PM, David Serrano <tor@dserrano5.es> wrote:
On 2015-07-07 15:19:18 (+0100), Joshua Lee Tucker wrote:
On 7/7/15, teor <teor2345@gmail.com> wrote:
Organisation X experiences an attack on their website via an IP address
Organisation X experiences a SSH login/password scan via an IP address
We could split the Exit column in two (web ports, other ports)
I personally don't like displaying the ports in the overview page - I would also much rather have this information displayed in a detail page. (Maybe make the "Exit: Yes" clickable?)
Throwing this idea out there instead of keeping it to myself: what about modifying the form to ask also for the destination port? So the investigator would enter source IP, dest port and date. Can be somewhat confusing due to the source/dest mix, but the "Exit" column in this case would be pretty clear because it would refer only to the required port.
-- David Serrano PGP: 1BCC1A1F280A01F9
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays