On 07 Jun (19:41:00), nusenu wrote:
DocTor [1] made me look into this.
_All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics: (not shown in the table to safe some space)
Yah, we got a report on bad-relays@ as well... We are looking into this but seems there is a distinctive pattern for most of them.
David
- OS: Linux
- run two instances per IP address (the number of relays is only odd
because in one case they created 3 keys per IP)
- ORPort: random
- DirPort: disabled
- Tor Version: 0.2.9.10
- ContactInfo: None
- MyFamily: None
- Joined the Tor network between 2017-06-07 15:37:32 and 2017-06-07
16:08:54 (UTC)
- Exit Policy summary: {u'reject': [u'25', u'119', u'135-139', u'445',
u'563', u'1214', u'4661-4666', u'6346-6429', u'6699', u'6881-6999']}
table is sorted by colmns 3,1,2 (in that order)
Group diversity:
20 distinct autonomous systems
18 distinct countries
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/81337aed747ea5c7dec57899b0e27e94/r...
Relay fingerprints are at the bottom of this file.
This list of relays is NOT identical to the one from DocTor (even though the number is identical (65)): [1] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2017-June/007968...
https://twitter.com/nusenu_/status/872536564647198720
-- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu https://twitter.com/nusenu_
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays