November 2016 - tor-project - lists.torproject.org

Summary of meek's costs, October 2016
by David Fifield 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

Here's the summary of meek's CDN fees for October 2016. App Engine + Amazon + Azure = total by period all 2014 $600.63 + $917.89 + $0.00 = $1518.52 January 2015 $464.37 + $669.02 + $0.00 = $1133.39 February 2015 $650.53 + $604.83 + $0.00 = $1255.36 March 2015 $690.29 + $815.68 + $0.00 = $1505.97 April 2015 $886.43 + $785.37 + $0.00 = $1671.80 May 2015 $871.64 + $896.39 + $0.00 = $1768.03 June 2015 $601.83 + $820.00 + $0.00 = $1421.83 July 2015 $732.01 + $837.08 + $0.00 = $1569.09 August 2015 $656.76 + $819.59 + $154.89 = $1631.24 September 2015 $617.08 + $710.75 + $490.58 = $1818.41 October 2015 $672.01 + $110.72 + $300.64 = $1083.37 November 2015 $602.35 + $474.13 + $174.18 = $1250.66 December 2015 $561.29 + $603.27 + $172.60 = $1337.16 January 2016 $771.17 + $1581.88 + $329.10 = $2682.15 February 2016 $986.39 + $977.85 + $445.83 = $2410.07 March 2016 $1079.49 + $865.06 + $534.71 = $2479.26 April 2016 $1169.23 + $1074.25 + $508.93 = $2752.41 May 2016 $525.46 + $1097.46 + $513.56 = $2136.48 June 2016 $0.00 + $1117.67 + $575.50 = $1693.17 July 2016 $0.00 + $1121.71 + $592.47 = $1714.18 August 2016 $0.00 + $1038.62 + $607.13 = $1645.75 September 2016 $0.00 + $932.22 + $592.92 = $1525.14 October 2016 $0.00 + $1259.19 + $646.00 = $1905.19 -- total by CDN $13138.96 + $20130.63 + $6031.91 = $39301.50 grand total https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-transport.html?start=2016-0… The number of users had a big drop, from 7,500 to 5,000. I initially thought that is was due to some new blocking event, because the drop was particularly severe in China. It affected several countries too, though, and that kind of coordinated blocking is unlikely. Our best guess for what happened was a bug in an Orbot release: https://bugs.torproject.org/20495#comment:8 It's since been fixed and the numbers went back to previous levels. == Amazon a.k.a. meek-amazon == EU (Ireland) 368M requests $442.35 2765 GB $218.62 Global 6M requests $6.78 27 GB $2.13 US East (Northern Virginia) 373M requests $373.43 2746 GB $215.36 -- total 748M requests $822.56 5539 GB $436.11 charge for alarms $0.50 https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/F4AD82B2032EDEF6C02C5A529C42CFAFE5165… == Azure a.k.a. meek-azure == This is the first time we've had charges for Zone 3 and Zone 4. According to https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cdn/, the zones are: Zone 1: North America, Europe, Middle East and Africa Zone 2: Asia Pacific (including Japan) Zone 3: South America Zone 4: Australia Zone 5: India Zone 1 6898 GB $600.10 Zone 2 328 GB $ 45.32 Zone 3 1 GB $ 0.22 Zone 4 3 GB $ 0.36 -- total 7230 GB $646.00 https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AA033EEB61601B2B7312D89B62AAA23DC3ED8… Earlier reports in this series: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/meek#Costs

1 0

Notes from November 17 2016 Vegas team meeting
by Karsten Loesing 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 See this posting for context: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-April/000223.html Notes for November 17 2016 meeting: Roger: 1) We know of zero Tor talks that were accepted for 33C3. The Tor Browser one got rejected, the OONI one got rejected, and ahf's erlang one got rejected. While I admit that there's a little part of me that says "well ok, let's take our ball and go home", I think we need to be well connected to Europe now more than ever. 2) Any new news on the blog migration? 3) New network team job offer! Plus they're gearing up to find a second person. 4) I increasingly think we need a network team engineer who focuses on the censorship side of things. We have a growing number of countries where Tor is being blocked in new and surprising ways -- Kazakhstan, Egypt, Turkey, etc -- and there is nobody on the Tor side who is investigating them or working to fix them or even keeping up-to-date on what's happening. I get that there's value in having another more generic network team developer too, so I don't want to stomp in and declare this as a priority over that though. 5) I have a vague memory of suggesting an in-person Vegas team meeting sometime. Should we move that forward? 6) Should we start calling for volunteers to attend the Valencia festival? Georg: 1) We got our releases with the donation banner out (although this time it is was a way bigger PITA than usual). From Nov 23 on our users will see it (assuming everything works the way we think our code works) 2) SponsorU progress Arturo: 1) OONI hackathon in Berlin went great! 2) Discussed with metrics team about integrating some OONI data into tor metrics. Nick: 1) Hacking all day; team is covering well I think. 2) 0.2.9.5-alpha needs testing Kate: 1) Answering press queries, etc. 2) Edited Tor phone prototype blog post and contacted reporters; Wired is interested. Mike: 1) Kevin has finished about half of the deliverables on the blog contract. He is also working on a document for Hiro for how to admin and update it and Tor Labs. We should put him in contact with her. Shari: 1) Working on final crunch to start end-of-year campaign on November 22. 2) Writing letters to former donors/supporters and blog post for campaign. 3) Getting new CFGO up-to-speed. 4) Working on budget for 2017. Let me know if there are things I might not know to include. Isabela: 1) finished reports 2) linda is working with the metrics team on the redesign/update of user experience - i am helping reviewing stuff 3) trying to get the global south effort organized, ilv is helping and sukhe shared interest in doing something - i need to get many different people who are coming to me with some way to help on it connected so we can better coordinate efforts 4) catching up on a lot of things i have on my list like network team wiki page update, following up with sida and maybe changing our strategy here a little and decouple the website deliverable so we can get this money fast and do this work in 2017 (aiaiai) and following up on some PETS work with Roger. Karsten: 1) Making pretty good progress on UX project to redesign the Tor Metrics website. 2) Moving forward with JavaScript on Tor Metrics website discussion. Alison: 1) Most of my time right now is being spent working on scaling outreach given the huge surge in demand. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYMuvOAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBCSMH/1yZ627OMRZXx70J5IqgAcLI veBOGPfUztvHFVsgoRgKiPuHm/pFzk/2lq0SwzYvJBGCTTbvWxQtNVvhlvMwYTPw FfI8SfgqcAt41HYaG2O8AAtL4veVO9umLbEp2hqkzAYWVvDuRvJ0jM0JXmI3g5wl DI0fXVmi2mZ+KxAgqOADBzanka+ZPkAbq46RsHb61kYy6AL11KMnHKcWmpaNNxD8 i19Og9XJeOThaCwTZhF50Au9wWVyciqnHhkCy5V5poqNhYWjG53NnhH0kay+sJbF FWra3wnl+YZDx2D6Gzqnrk5wnfQiDWxS318FN2E4G1SzcnV9dQ4hkVGii/epOWo= =amF8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Requiring JavaScript on Tor Metrics
by Karsten Loesing 17 Nov '16

17 Nov '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, I'm moving this (old but recently continued) thread from an internal mailing list to this list as suggested by Roger. Any feedback would be most useful by Wednesday, November 16. Thanks! All the best, Karsten On 07/12/15 14:09, Karsten Loesing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we're discussing changing the graphing engine on Tor Metrics from > generating static images on the server using R/ggplot2 towards > generating interactive visualizations using JavaScript on the > client. > > As a result, Tor Metrics will require Tor Browser users to switch > to Medium-High Security or lower. > > This switch has some potential with respect to visualizations, and > the visualization people in the metrics team want to do it. It > allows producing more graphs like Lunar's bubble graph: > > https://metrics.torproject.org/bubbles.html > > In fact, it would allow all kinds of visualizations like the ones > seen in the D3 gallery: > > https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/Gallery > > So, my question is: can you all live with this change? > > The next step will be to ask users on tor-talk@, but I figured I > should ask here first. If I don't hear any strong objections by > Thursday, I'll go ask on tor-talk@. > > Thanks! > > All the best, Karsten On 07/12/15 15:22, somebody else wrote: > I assume it would be infeasible to maintain non-Javascript > fallbacks, correct? > > Likewise, I assume it would be too difficult (for now (?)) to try > something crazy-fancy like render the javascript versions on the > server and serve them as images in that case? [0] > > [0] I'm hand-waving about whether or not this is possible, but it > seems like it in theory, and at least one person has tried: > http://blog.davidpadbury.com/2010/10/03/using-nodejs-to-render-js-charts-on… On 08/12/15 00:34, somebody wrote: > I don't understand why you would want Tor users to lower their > security in order to get prettier graphs. Is there some obvious > thing I am missing? > > Personally I run with Javascript disabled on the vast majority of > web sites I access (via NoScript), and with third party "included" > Javascript disabled virtually everywhere (via PrivacyBadger and > sometimes RequestPolicy). Having web sites run their own choice > of programs in my computer seems like a really stupid idea. I can > only assume that its prevalence as a technique reflects how little > respect the average web site has for the security of its users. On 09/12/15 08:45, another person wrote: > I'd like to know how much work it would be. On 09/12/15 13:59, Karsten Loesing wrote: > I'll try to find out. I think that having non-JavaScript > fallbacks written in a different language would be infeasible. But > I could imagine that we render D3.js graphs on the server using > Node.js and return images to the client. > > I'm mostly worried about the lack of interactivity. I'd really > want to get away from requiring a full round-trip from client to > server and back just to change something in the displayed graph. > Maybe we can keep them somewhat interactive, or at least add > tooltips, by using SVG as image format. > > But please understand that while I'm doing okay at processing > large amounts of data, I don't know much about web development. If > people here have ideas, please let me know! > > Note that investigating these options may take a while, mostly > because people in the metrics team are busy. But we won't switch > to client-side JavaScript before we know about possible > alternatives. > > Thanks for the feedback. This is very helpful! > > All the best, Karsten On 12/11/16 16:37, Karsten Loesing wrote: > Hello everyone, > > apologies for digging out such an old thread, but after almost > starting a new thread on the exact same topic I remembered that we > had this discussion almost a year ago. I figured it's better to > continue this thread to avoid discussing the exact same things > again and instead add new thoughts below. > > So, on Thursday, Linda, iwakeh, and I met in Berlin to talk about > making the Tor Metrics website more usable. We came up with some > pretty good ideas to better address the various user types---from > journalists to data scientists---coming to the Tor Metrics website > to learn interesting things about the deployed Tor network. We'll > share results with you in a few weeks from now when there's > something to see and click on. > > But in this context I want to bring up the topic of JavaScript > once more. > > To be clear, our immediate plans---including reorganizing > information and displaying sparklines as quick entry points into > the data---don't require JavaScript on Tor Metrics. And even our > planned improvements might work without JavaScript---including more > customizable graphs and even a dashboard with user-selected > graphs---can be made to work without JavaScript. Though the latter > will be a stretch. > > The question is: do we have to keep stretching by avoiding a web > techology that would make our lives and the lives of our users so > much easier? > > This isn't really something that we can work around by generating > graphs with a JavaScript library on the server. I'd want us to > switch to another graphing framework such as R Shiny (which I used > for the webstats prototype) or D3.js (which we currently use on Tor > Metrics just for the bubbles graph, though not in the most > efficient way). > > - From a development perspective this switch would make a lot of > sense, because we'd have to write a lot less code for new graphs > and because there'd be potential contributors out there who'd > appreciate working with a known framework. Our current graphing > engine doesn't scale much longer, and this does slow us down. > > Note that I'm not arguing to use JavaScript in all places, just > because we can. I'm in favor of keeping all the parts of Tor > Metrics where we provide textual or static information entirely > JavaScript-free, so that our data will still be available to users > that don't have or don't want to use JavaScript. And services > like ExoneraTor could easily stay JavaScript-free. > > But the parts of Tor Metrics where we're providing visualizations > and letting users explore our data would require JavaScript. This > would include all graphs and tables, because we shouldn't be > maintaining two graphing engines. > > So, how do we decide this? I believe that this should be a > Tor-wide decision. My main worry is that we're sinking weeks and > weeks of development effort into this switch without many Tor > people noticing, and then once we publish and they get aware, we > need to roll back, wasting all the effort. > > But to be honest, we're wasting effort right now by keeping the > workarounds and implementing hacks with dynamically generated HTML > forms and potentially dozens of parameters just to avoid the devil > called JavaScript. This feels like a bad use of our time. > > Here's my suggestion: unless somebody raises a valid concern how > requiring JavaScript on Tor Metrics is *bad for Tor*, say, by next > Wednesday, November 16, we're putting this on the hold again. > (That's the day before the next metrics team meeting and Vegas > meeting, and it should be enough time to raise your voice.) > > Otherwise we'll switch. > > Oh, and if you're in favor of switching, please consider saying > that, too. Thanks. > > All the best, Karsten On 13/11/16 05:04, Roger Dingledine wrote: > Does this mean that we'd be breaking the "download a static version > of the graph" feature too? I use that feature a lot for grabbing > snapshots to put into presentations, and we also want to use it for > pulling in metrics graphs in blog posts, e.g. > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tracking-impact-whatsapp-blockage-tor > > as well as for external journalists. > > Oh, I should also say this would be a great topic for the > tor-project list, since it doesn't need to be sekrit (and since > then other people could know that it's a topic we're considering, > and maybe even help us make the right decision). On 13/11/16 10:08, Karsten Loesing wrote: > It's quite easy to implement that feature using Shiny, for > example. Either Shiny would produce a .png file that you can > download using your browser's "Save Image As..." feature, or there > would be a "Download Graph" button. It would be just a few lines > of code. > > And we'd be able to provide features like a "Download graph data" > button with just a few more lines of code, which would require a > lot more effort right now. > > Good idea. How about I move over the thread with all responses so > far and with names of previous posters redacted? I can do that > later today, unless I hear it's a bad idea. > > All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYKIymAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBMFUIAMAP1LJYv+QEEUtQN5AAXaGP ZvmPrIlWrnhvoY1Uy/iPkYMsLqTtHNn3RkIfvfBj5LOafBBinkRL/pm8DHnHDrGw OLoo12t1ZHKiQk62eB+FNnnBfXdDoitdcaFCm92N+aItHY37qe9pJRICkA/QvtwA eUHRBAsrn/g6F6CSQT+jpSTJfCOnmWuPrD9nEqA6DD3e37+f1MDyBnre/mgMQG2e hZ5jhdwToX4z4LBIL4ilJoFkWjLDPlc4H+MdaMEXN3CHwd5XTXK7xJUhsaJwb/+k JzujeI5J7p6kJCEx2PbhCZMqSyNLmjiFjTWE0Xi1YNLyaQ6QtDvf8nzpBdRcvkY= =HA4c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

6 10

About the importance of website metrics
by Nima Fatemi 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Hey there, I just found out about https://tor-metrics.shinyapps.io/webstats/ through 'boklm' on IRC and after playing around with it for a couple of mins I found so many important and noteworthy things and it got me excited too much to not to share it with the list. Here's just one of the things I noticed. If you look at this graph from Aug 2016 to Sep 2016 [1], you'll notice that: - the number of hits on home page are (~55k on average) lower than the number of hits on download page. - the number of initial downloads are (~50k on average) lower than number of hits on download page. Of course it needs much deeper analysis but that quick look tells me one of the primary goals of the people who visit Tor Project website seems to be downloading Tor Browser and a big portion of them fail to do so. We can definitely use this data while rebuilding the website. You might say it's obvious that the download of our primary product on the website, but it's something else when you can measure it with actual data. Specially when things aren't as good as their potential and when there's room to improve. This is really exciting and amazing work. Kudos to metrics team and Sebastian for providing anonymized webstats and visualizing them. PS: I've a question: how often do the web stats get pushed? seems like the last push was on Sep 15th. And whether it's possible to have them in a closer-to-real-time basis. (ie. once a day). PPS: Apologies about the cross-post. It seemed like this email is valid for all three lists, and members don't necessarily overlap. [1] https://people.torproject.org/~nima/ux/home_dl-page_dl.png Cheers, -- Nima 0X58C4B928A3E218F6 | @mrphs "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" --Evelyn Beatrice Hall

2 1

meek blocked in China since 2016-10-19
by David Fifield 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

https://bugs.torproject.org/20495 It looks like meek has been blocked in China since about 2016-10-19. (See the red line in the attached graph.) I didn't get any reports or anything; I just happened to check the graph. I tried but have not yet been able to reproduce any blocking by making HTTPS requests from a measurement location in China.

3 3

Notes from November 10 2016 Vegas team meeting
by Karsten Loesing 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 See this posting for context: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-April/000223.html Notes for November 10 2016 meeting: Georg: 1) Preparations for releases with donation banner (6.0.6, 6.5a4 and 6.5a4-hardened) 2) More coordination with Mozilla on a roadmap for Tor related things 3) How to bill for future OTF work? Isabela: 1) Behind with reports -- priority to get it done asap 2) Linda is working with Metrics team on ux for the metrics.tpo page - she is documenting the project here -> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/UX/MetricsRedesign / she is also in Berlin now and has a lot of different things going on, meeting w/ metrics team, working w/ ooni on new hiring, participating/presenting at underexposed (ux event organized by simply secure) 3) I wonder if I should write a report back from chile - in short I presented to librarians students at a university and has a contact who wants to help get a library to be a pilot in chile (at least start with the LFP privacy pledge / did a training with around 25 people / did a interview for a local tech mgz / presented at another university / presented at primavera hacker / met with university of chile about hosting a tor relay (sent report about this one) 4) campus party brazil (10k people audience) offered Tor a space for the whole week to do presentations, workshops etc. I am trying to organize the space with local people who are part of the community 5) misc - catching up with hiring for network team and ooni / trying to following up with donation campaign stuff / misc network team stuff Nick: 1) End-of-month crunch 2) Hiring. 3) I've been reading/watching these once or twice a day: http://www.humansofnewyork.com/post/152973683571/i-first-ran-for-congress-i… https://boingboing.net/2016/11/09/harvey-milks-hope-speech.html Alison: 1) Checking in with Colin tomorrow about creating a support portal timeline. 2) Sent the community council guidelines to the -internal list for feedback Kate: 1) Fewer than normal media interactions because of election media deluge. 2) Writing press releases for OONI and user manual. Mike: 1) Phone Blog Post draft is mostly written. I could use some help from Kate, others. 2) Tor Labs Arturo: 1) OONI internal meeting (did a lot of very useful discussions and planning for the next steps) + open hackathon happening tomorrow. Karsten: 1) Berlin UX/metrics team meeting with Linda (lnl) and iwakeh to redesign Tor Metrics website. We made some good progress here, but we also decided not to do all the things at once. 2) We'll have a web designer to implement the Tor Metrics website changes in November/December. 3) Asked Silvia (hiro) to help with getting metrics builds on Jenkins and giving feedback on the CollecTor manual. Shari: 1) end of year stuff 2) personnel stuff 3) planning Amsterdam Tor meeting -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYKZ7HAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBe3IH/3ZJt+sINsFUb+8jSAzxOIOn JBg3YJSdNx10B7t0XD/o8bOvMJu1SVuR59K/r4ySEndUiGt+uJoQGiK9gf7aetlC zf9xO6I+P8BUBHoFeDSF5m9nHaD4bmBmy//gMF8Yj06XPknseWHtQTK1mApLdHNY dR/KbwbJ1q3/nGkWRskFCkiypg178BH9Anjq0ro3X6EoAyg3x2W1pFCtdVvW+pT1 YI41GLH8ILtON11mpjlOX2HceyKL0cvBvsRXWwx7BW1IkY86eBWbIefZRqFQB8vS 8yNcSvXG8t5fUI7GUGBDiqOcax1kJ0fVvGHN5yPm7esLiwhG++ipnqd7+93OR9M= =JMl3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Aspiration Dev Summit
by Allen Gunn 13 Nov '16

13 Nov '16

Hi friends, I hope this finds you all well and having good weekends after a tough week at least in the US. With apologies for not posting this sooner, I wanted to let folks on this list know about our annual Nonprofit Software Development Summit, taking place this year 16-18 November in Oakland, California US. More information is here: https://aspirationtech.org/events/devsummit16 It's a place to share Tor-related knowledge, projects and updates with a diverse network of activists, and meet other techies focused on free, open and non-corporate efforts for privacy, anonymity and general good. We have some Tor-identified folks coming, and we welcome more if you are in range of the Bay Area. We have guest registrations available for anyone who wants to join, and even have a little travel budget left if you are inclined to come from farther away. I'm happy to answer questions. Hope to see some of you there. thanks & peace, gunner -- Allen Gunn Executive Director, Aspiration +1.415.216.7252 www.aspirationtech.org Aspiration: "Better Tools for a Better World" Read our Manifesto: http://aspirationtech.org/publications/manifesto Follow us: Facebook: www.facebook.com/aspirationtech Twitter: www.twitter.com/aspirationtech --

1 0

Report on meeting with university of Chile on hosting Tor relays
by isabela 08 Nov '16

08 Nov '16

Background: During Tor Meeting in Seattle (2016) we had a session to discuss about building a stronger presence in the global south. One of the things that came out of the session was to build partnership with universities in the global south, starting in Latin America, to seek the opportunity to have them hosting Tor relays. University of Chile meeting: Isabela and ilv met with Salvador Millaleo, the coordinator of 'Centro de Estudos de Derecho Informático' -- Center of Studies of Computer Law -- or something close to it :) they exist for a long time and one of the people working there too is the founder of Derechos Digitales. We explained why Tor would like to have more servers in the south, how that was important for the network to have geolocation diversity and also how that could be something interesting for them. We said that beyond helping with our mission, which has to do with their mission as well (freedom of expression and privacy online) it could be a great opportunity for them as a study center in the university for research. They were very excited about it and said they were going to reach out to the CS department to build a partnership with them on hosting a tor relay. I mentioned that for the CS department that could also be a very good opportunity for the students to learn more about security and privacy online and to do research. We mentioned PETS as it seems one professor from there (Alejandro Hevia) have been part of PETS committee to review papers. Next steps: We will follow up with Salvador and try to establish a contact with someone at the CS school there as well to see if we can get them excited about hosting a relay. We also plan on document the discussion we had at the last Tor Meeting inside the community team wiki (finally) so we can carry on this work in a more organized way :) and in coordination with the community team. Reach out to other universities in Latin America. Work with Derechos Digitales to see if we can initiate a campaign for tor relays in the region -- which will be a big help with this initiative.

1 0

Notes from November 3 2016 Vegas team meeting
by Karsten Loesing 07 Nov '16

07 Nov '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 See this posting for context: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-April/000223.html Notes for November 3 2016 meeting: Karsten: 1) Let's start thinking about mass mailing donors from the last fundraising campaign, in a way that they won't hate us. Nick: 1) sponsor-U guard hacking targets. Arturo: 1) Working on having better integration testing for the various OONI components after a critical bug came out in 2.0.0 (will probably be something based on travis and docker). 2) The OONI hackathon is 1 week away. Georg: 1) Firefox releases got moved one week and Tor Browser will follow which means we have one week more to test the donation banners and to get the strings for the fundraising campaign translated (the english ones landed on Torbutton master) Shari: 1) a couple of personnel things 2) trying to get end-of-year fundraising stuff in place, including reaching out to major donors (suggestions welcomed on folks to approach!) 3) started meeting planning for Amsterdam (suggestions welcomed on this topic, as well!) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYIENsAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBrk0IAMNrqTxA6uL6N5AER+jPXQT+ XbATt5Jy2UE8yoFkekQe3R9zQ5Dg3UJLJyfzjiVylE5CKOk0BXEElFb2Hr/ge30a h1YB3SlowakVIjM7JOycBxHW4zJqha0gAlqN2tvboqHsQp2paixs+1jWe6AxVY16 fAVh8gmWqerV40N0SuFDq3zVN5YmkT7D3XZuWCCZQ5vzSbjUHubvzEeQ/TGm7mNq 2l6RIDj1orxw6r0S7Tq6ro0qo/Th2DrPbI8d2qPI4a1BpNYXSYr7GwVNhUYIl/Q2 NJgQyKSqL6crpiWVhE3lu8Kjspx/iUUgMARfmFKY64AeVEOoLTB3yGL7UC+si8k= =E2w8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Notes from October 27 2016 Vegas team meeting
by Karsten Loesing 01 Nov '16

01 Nov '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 See this posting for context: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-April/000223.html Notes for October 27 2016 meeting: Alison: 1) Not much to report this week: working on membership docs, doing lots of trainings around New England, USA Roger: 1) It looks like we're moving forward on a preliminary NSF proposal to work on a plan for a live testing Tor network, which can help answer more realistic research questions than tools like Chutney or Shadow can answer. If we do it we'll be submitting it within a week. Cass is in the loop. 2) Reminder that I'll be offline from Nov 3 through Nov 11ish. Kate: 1) Coordinating a few blog posts 2) Networking with colleagues in other NGOS (best practices, etc.) 3) Stillll following up with major stories in the offing (that have been going forever). 4) Not much else this week (was sick for a couple days earlier) Arturo: 1) Got the thread for the UX design hire started 2) Publishing a report on censorship in Egypt that includes some analysis of how they are blocking Tor: https://ooni.torproject.org/post/egypt-network-interference/ 3) Published announcement of the Hackthon in Berlin (seems like the metrics team is also there during those days, yay!) https://ooni.torproject.org/post/berlin-hackathon-2016/ Georg: 1) Got nightly builds working again (thanks to ln5) 2) SponsorU work and release preparations Nick: 1) Let's keep the testing coming! Karsten: 1) We're debugging the new sync feature of CollecTor and should have a release in the next couple of days. 2) Will soon need help with invoicing for the first completed Sponsor X task. 3) We'll soon have a web designer to help with Metrics website improvements and Atlas usability tweaks. Isabela: 1) Silvia - new services maintainer starts on Nov 2nd! - I am trying to organize her on-boarding as I won't be online as much due to trip to Chile 2) Linda is kicking ass :) I couldn't be happier with the work she is doing. We are closing the loop with the security slider on orfox, she also documented all this work in the team wiki and organized the whole thing. Now she is preparing for her trip to Berlin and for our next job which is to work with the metrics team on the site usability report 3) Preparing for Chile - 3 different talks and one workshop - translating a lot of things to spanish etc 4) Working on Q3 report for DRL (vixe maria!) 5) Trying to get people to test tor alpha release 6) grant stuff - hiring new people stuff Shari: 1) lots of preparation for end-of-year campaign 2) preliminary planning stuff for Amsterdam 2017 meeting 3) catching up after time out of the office, Tor meeting, etc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYGLiIAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBrt8H/jlaxfviWB3vSAXIiqY+HQnF YSpLLp0LF8GEBO52cq06oKNxyMBmkKK6FmUVKMhMWF8qPmsfbv0Y0zwMAfap0Tfk fVHSWn+NIXGCW5WdJarXiwMNHT7pKOz3qJNNhORpMnplCDK/MG1DCT5MT2D96Z7E rhJLxb9pg4OM//wSFNs4Q2ZAEdhBABz3TE0BUVv4c0VbZtMXw7pRN4df0S4jzeu+ miJkGD6SJht1qKmpU2s3ZSeA2If9SqVddGf60bQo0lHLV0f6/nnpZD6/Vb7vLlT4 tBm0D+CoWEVWrxJXnpFyNNE35Jd8wWM3/O2MjgttEvWneNkNURoNl/ZQnOMSO3M= =Wdam -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0