On 9 Mar 2016, at 05:33, Ann O'Nymous ann.onymous@vfemail.net wrote:
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
Hi Kate,
Aaron and others currently favour "open onion services".
What do you think?
I remain persuaded by Paul Syverson's arguments for using names that reflect design. Design is unambiguous and reliably accurate, unless there have been substantive coding or merging errors. Conversely, functionality, usage and applicability by threat model are all ephemeral. Bugs and unforseen vulnerabilities can make such names inaccurate and misleading, or even ironic.
So what name(s) would you or Paul suggest based on the design in #17178 (otherwise known as Rendezvous Single Onion Services)? I've tried to find out, but it's lost somewhere in the backlog.
Tim
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B
teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F