On 9 Mar 2016, at 05:33, Ann O'Nymous <ann.onymous@vfemail.net> wrote:Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:Hi Kate,
Aaron and others currently favour "open onion services".
What do you think?
I remain persuaded by Paul Syverson's arguments for using names that
reflect design. Design is unambiguous and reliably accurate, unless
there have been substantive coding or merging errors. Conversely,
functionality, usage and applicability by threat model are all
ephemeral. Bugs and unforseen vulnerabilities can make such names
inaccurate and misleading, or even ironic.