Hi,
The roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [1] wiki page has been started with the goal of communicating the status of the work with Tor on IPv6.
Additionally, searching for Trac tickets with the keyword "ipv6" [2] might give a picture of what's going on.
Asking here or highlighting ln5 on #tor-dev is of course another perfectly fine option.
[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?keywords=~ipv6
On 2012-08-16 22:45, Linus Nordberg wrote:
Hi,
The roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [1] wiki page has been started with the goal of communicating the status of the work with Tor on IPv6.
Additionally, searching for Trac tickets with the keyword "ipv6" [2] might give a picture of what's going on.
Asking here or highlighting ln5 on #tor-dev is of course another perfectly fine option.
[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?keywords=~ipv6
I do not see a 'how to help with testing' ticket/description yet.
As such, how can we help with testing? ;)
Greets, Jeroen
Jeroen Massar jeroen@unfix.org wrote Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:07:30 +0200:
| > [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 | > [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?keywords=~ipv6 | | I do not see a 'how to help with testing' ticket/description yet.
I've added a section on how to help testing to https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 .
Thanks.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:45:47 +0000, Linus Nordberg wrote: ...
The roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [1] wiki page has been started with the goal of communicating the status of the work with Tor on IPv6.
Hmm, is there any thought of allowing IPv6 addresses for accessing hidden services? Or do you expect it to always be 127.0.0.1 anyway?
Andreas
Andreas Krey a.krey@gmx.de wrote Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:50:11 +0200:
| On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:45:47 +0000, Linus Nordberg wrote: | ... | > The roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [1] wiki page has been started with the goal of | > communicating the status of the work with Tor on IPv6. | | Hmm, is there any thought of allowing IPv6 addresses for accessing | hidden services? Or do you expect it to always be 127.0.0.1 anyway?
I think that we should allow IPv6 addresses in the HiddenServicePort option too and that proposal 186 should be updated to consider hidden services too.
Thanks.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:13:37 +0000, Linus Nordberg wrote: ...
I think that we should allow IPv6 addresses in the HiddenServicePort
Turns out it already does (tor_addr_port_lookup()). Seems that changing the parsing & processing for IPv6 'bridge' already did the trick.
Tested with ::1 only, have not real v6 here and now, and the linklocal%vboxnet0 notation doesn't work here at all.
option too and that proposal 186 should be updated to consider hidden services too.
That probably remains to be done. I wanted to get my feet wet in the codebase. :-)
Andreas
-
Andreas Krey -
Jeroen Massar -
Linus Nordberg -
Linus Nordberg