Re: [tor-dev] onionoo: bug in family set detection?

Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:52:00 +0000 From: nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>
teor:
MyFamily requires bidirectional declarations to be effective.
I'm aware of that fact ;)
In this case: OnionOO appears to correctly implement the bidirectional MyFamily logic
Apparently it doesn't.
Since onionoo says there is a bidirectional "connection" (family) between 5510FC1736B16D46D3F2DDA5011995C478D42594 => 0C77421C890D16B6D201283A2244F43DF5BC89DD
but there is none.. (as explained in my last email)
Compass does *not* say that there is a bidirectional connection between those relays.. onionoo says there is one even though I can't see it, do you see it?
I'm sorry, I must have got the onionoo and Compass results mixed up somehow. In Compass, I see that: 5510FC1736B16D46D3F2DDA5011995C478D42594 has no family. In Globe/Atlas (based on onionoo), I see that: 5510FC1736B16D46D3F2DDA5011995C478D42594 has a very large family. So my criticism of Compass actually applies to onionoo. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7
participants (1)
-
teor