Release Candidate: TBB 3.6 + fteproxy 0.2.6
Hi all, Please see [2] for a patch that integrates fteproxy into dcf's 3.6-beta branch [3] of the TBB. This integration targets version v0.2.6 of fteproxy [1]. asn/mikeperry - What do you need from me to merge this patch to master? -Kevin [1] https://github.com/kpdyer/fteproxy/releases [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10362#comment:11 [3] https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/dcf/tor-browser-bundle.git
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:49:59AM -0600, Kevin P Dyer wrote:
Please see [2] for a patch that integrates fteproxy into dcf's 3.6-beta branch [3] of the TBB.
This integration targets version v0.2.6 of fteproxy [1].
asn/mikeperry - What do you need from me to merge this patch to master?
I will try building it and let you know how it goes. You probably want to try rebasing on the mainline tag tbb-3.5.1-build7 https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tag/refs/tags/..., because the pt branch has already been merged there. There were a couple of changes related to openssl that may or may not affect you. David Fifield
Hi Mike, dcf and I have been working to validate my TBB+fteproxy patch [1]. My patch results in a build that's deterministic for dcf and I [2]. I've verified that the binaries produced work on their respective target platforms. The TBB+fteproxy repo. is on github [3]. What do you need from me to merge these changes upstream? -Kevin [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10362 [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10362#comment:21 [3] https://github.com/kpdyer/tor-browser-bundle/tree/fte On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, David Fifield <david@bamsoftware.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:49:59AM -0600, Kevin P Dyer wrote:
Please see [2] for a patch that integrates fteproxy into dcf's 3.6-beta branch [3] of the TBB.
This integration targets version v0.2.6 of fteproxy [1].
asn/mikeperry - What do you need from me to merge this patch to master?
I will try building it and let you know how it goes.
You probably want to try rebasing on the mainline tag tbb-3.5.1-build7
https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tag/refs/tags/... , because the pt branch has already been merged there. There were a couple of changes related to openssl that may or may not affect you.
David Fifield
I've put a tag on them to review them. It looks like Lunar found an issue with tor-fw-helper Ubuntu though (see tor-qa). Kevin P Dyer:
Hi Mike,
dcf and I have been working to validate my TBB+fteproxy patch [1]. My patch results in a build that's deterministic for dcf and I [2]. I've verified that the binaries produced work on their respective target platforms.
The TBB+fteproxy repo. is on github [3].
What do you need from me to merge these changes upstream?
-Kevin
[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10362 [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10362#comment:21 [3] https://github.com/kpdyer/tor-browser-bundle/tree/fte
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, David Fifield <david@bamsoftware.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:49:59AM -0600, Kevin P Dyer wrote:
Please see [2] for a patch that integrates fteproxy into dcf's 3.6-beta branch [3] of the TBB.
This integration targets version v0.2.6 of fteproxy [1].
asn/mikeperry - What do you need from me to merge this patch to master?
I will try building it and let you know how it goes.
You probably want to try rebasing on the mainline tag tbb-3.5.1-build7
https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tag/refs/tags/... , because the pt branch has already been merged there. There were a couple of changes related to openssl that may or may not affect you.
David Fifield
-- Mike Perry
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 07:25:47PM +0000, mikeperry wrote:
I've put a tag on them to review them. It looks like Lunar found an issue with tor-fw-helper Ubuntu though (see tor-qa).
tor-fw-helper is a separate bunch of packages; Kevin's FTE packages don't have anything to do with those. I suspect FTE will be ready to merge before tor-fw-helper is. The tor-fw-helper packages I floated to tor-qa were more to measure whether it's worth trying to ship tor-fw-helper at all; i.e., if it only works for 10% of users, maybe not; if 50%, maybe so. I would feel more comfortable if there first were a code audit on miniupnpc and libnatpmp as well. David Fifield
participants (3)
-
David Fifield -
Kevin P Dyer -
mikeperry