Pluggable transport weekly meeting
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we can kick this off soon. Thanks, Vmon ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <vmonmoonshine@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:46 AM Subject: Pluggable transport weekly meeting To: tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org Hello Tor devs, Following up on what we came up with in the dev summit ( https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2013SummerDevMeet... ), we are going to have weekly 30-minute IRC meeting focusing on pluggable transports. The format (I think) will be scrum-esque that every developer who is working on a pluggable transport will update everybody else about the work they did/are doing on their transport during the week and ask questions if they have any, for example if they got stuck somewhere and they think somebody can help. Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not, but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to pick a better day. For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions of the current transport developers, we'll probably end up having a CEST evening and PST morning meeting. Having that in mind I suggest: CEST: 18:00 BST (Summer GMT): 17:00 EST: 12:00 MNT: 10:00 PST: 9:00 So if this doesn't work for you, please reply to this email with your alternative proposal. Thanks, Vmon
On 2013-09-06 01:58, Vmon wrote:
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we can kick this off soon.
Assuming not today (2013/09/16) isn't "soon", the times specified works for me and I will make an effort to attend. Regards, -- Yawning Angel
On 06/09/13 09:58, Vmon wrote:
Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not, but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to pick a better day.
For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions of the current transport developers, we'll probably end up having a CEST evening and PST morning meeting. Having that in mind I suggest:
CEST: 18:00 BST (Summer GMT): 17:00 EST: 12:00 MNT: 10:00 PST: 9:00
So if this doesn't work for you, please reply to this email with your alternative proposal.
WFM, I will be online today at that time even. -- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
That day and time work well for me -- thanks for setting this up! =) ~Griffin On 09/06/2013 04:58 AM, Vmon wrote:
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we can kick this off soon.
Thanks, Vmon
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <vmonmoonshine@gmail.com <mailto:vmonmoonshine@gmail.com>> Date: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:46 AM Subject: Pluggable transport weekly meeting To: tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org>
Hello Tor devs,
Following up on what we came up with in the dev summit (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2013SummerDevMeet...), we are going to have weekly 30-minute IRC meeting focusing on pluggable transports. The format (I think) will be scrum-esque that every developer who is working on a pluggable transport will update everybody else about the work they did/are doing on their transport during the week and ask questions if they have any, for example if they got stuck somewhere and they think somebody can help.
Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not, but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to pick a better day.
For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions of the current transport developers, we'll probably end up having a CEST evening and PST morning meeting. Having that in mind I suggest:
CEST: 18:00 BST (Summer GMT): 17:00 EST: 12:00 MNT: 10:00 PST: 9:00
So if this doesn't work for you, please reply to this email with your alternative proposal.
Thanks, Vmon
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
-- "Cypherpunks write code not flame wars." --Jurre van Bergen #Foucault / PGP: 0xAE792C97 / OTR: saint@jabber.ccc.de My posts are my own, not my employer's.
I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a working group too.) ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package. X On 06/09/13 13:44, Griffin Boyce wrote:
That day and time work well for me -- thanks for setting this up! =)
~Griffin
On 09/06/2013 04:58 AM, Vmon wrote:
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we can kick this off soon.
Thanks, Vmon
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <vmonmoonshine@gmail.com <mailto:vmonmoonshine@gmail.com>> Date: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:46 AM Subject: Pluggable transport weekly meeting To: tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org>
Hello Tor devs,
Following up on what we came up with in the dev summit (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2013SummerDevMeet...), we are going to have weekly 30-minute IRC meeting focusing on pluggable transports. The format (I think) will be scrum-esque that every developer who is working on a pluggable transport will update everybody else about the work they did/are doing on their transport during the week and ask questions if they have any, for example if they got stuck somewhere and they think somebody can help.
Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not, but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to pick a better day.
For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions of the current transport developers, we'll probably end up having a CEST evening and PST morning meeting. Having that in mind I suggest:
CEST: 18:00 BST (Summer GMT): 17:00 EST: 12:00 MNT: 10:00 PST: 9:00
So if this doesn't work for you, please reply to this email with your alternative proposal.
Thanks, Vmon
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
-- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
Ximin Luo:
I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a working group too.)
ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package.
I have heard people making the argument that obfsproxy, at least, was not specific to Tor and could perfectly be used with plain SSH. The prefix “tor-pt-” would not really be appropriate then. -- Lunar <lunar@torproject.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/09/13 15:33, Lunar wrote:
Ximin Luo:
I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a working group too.)
ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package.
I have heard people making the argument that obfsproxy, at least, was not specific to Tor and could perfectly be used with plain SSH. The prefix ?tor-pt-? would not really be appropriate then.
That is an argument that supports keeping the current name, but not directly a counter-argument against changing it. I'd say that if a package advertises managed mode (using the Tor managed PT envvar/stdio protocol) as its primary usage, then it clearly thinks of itself primarily as a Tor PT, and so it's a good candidate for being named tor-pt-*. (obfsproxy does this.) - -- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSLQVNAAoJEIYN7zuPZQt5EEoP/RzPPkMVjPvYfOb8CMF8UEa4 vWp1rrNc3w8nurH5/GWIcuxnIjm/9FzAxAI3tKGajX6RV9jvH364wNIgy4moXBLc 0070ItZB7UKHTLhGr7cbyPG11y1nyVpy4dw0fJFs6t9aYHWHBVbuWONDTbUm+T7D xFyql3CimIA3TvF/hE0G2wNSdxm2DbNfy3vTp32jhPanYVTyaUcRxEwYBo9LMkvh ShU4O0IsyRHSCIAKxNVxvLnwsJQS8ipTpHKTo+qfAUtRQTzl9hfzaP7/RjL6NNUN LQLzU9vlOcyA2tCmZKbKzGrp1QzFksWRIz4UY+uqKxnJWLODO8FtEEwS/BMc6G3g zcxRVsjqOxvdfy31MM/LCvm0wu2fWanovrkXTxOHCqsNl3io3w6pVpSTny4NvmKe wm3AVf/mBIn/ZwYY7UiPpH+ClsgsT7Vu6gzYM+2Zct0gxd3+KL9GI5pVwt1AQ2QA tAvclEQuRgu+tTHZgHCA1GVdQNhaOqjq3EI3BA1PYN1xS5ite2Hd6pI1lo8TFCIJ xBcVn4hG9mVgSDaKndtxgNea3qLxFW9tTSfUMykVsHajuOlrM/7FsgvB4ljsmFYD OaGnB8xp/0vBH0+mXcOlMan3FOfAW/TQRVreTT4goxpcCNpWLT5hU5AzQ8QkLQUx ky2sGNRzSwuN6xzKk4/r =A8e2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi all, Will we be having the first Pluggable Transport Weekly tomorrow? I'm working towards getting a build environment setup for the PTTBB and would like to chat about it, to ensure I'm not duplicating previous efforts. Thanks, Kevin On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Vmon <vmonmoonshine@gmail.com> wrote:
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we can kick this off soon.
Thanks, Vmon
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <vmonmoonshine@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:46 AM Subject: Pluggable transport weekly meeting To: tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org
Hello Tor devs,
Following up on what we came up with in the dev summit ( https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2013SummerDevMeet... ), we are going to have weekly 30-minute IRC meeting focusing on pluggable transports. The format (I think) will be scrum-esque that every developer who is working on a pluggable transport will update everybody else about the work they did/are doing on their transport during the week and ask questions if they have any, for example if they got stuck somewhere and they think somebody can help.
Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not, but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to pick a better day.
For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions of the current transport developers, we'll probably end up having a CEST evening and PST morning meeting. Having that in mind I suggest:
CEST: 18:00 BST (Summer GMT): 17:00 EST: 12:00 MNT: 10:00 PST: 9:00
So if this doesn't work for you, please reply to this email with your alternative proposal.
Thanks, Vmon
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
I thought we were having it at noon EST tomorrow. If no one else shows up, maybe we can have a discussion about cats or something. (Or just show up in #tor-dev and start talking about pluggable transports until it turns into a meeting ;-) ) ~Griffin Kevin P Dyer wrote:
Hi all,
Will we be having the first Pluggable Transport Weekly tomorrow?
I'm working towards getting a build environment setup for the PTTBB and would like to chat about it, to ensure I'm not duplicating previous efforts.
Thanks, Kevin
participants (7)
-
Griffin Boyce -
Kevin P Dyer -
Lunar -
Philipp Winter -
Vmon -
Ximin Luo -
Yawning Angel