-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23/03/15 16:33, Nusenu wrote:
Karsten Loesing:
maybe give it a new name
Is 'aggregator' ok, or should there be no 'tor' in the word at all?
I think "onion" is the new "tor" to build names around. Though I don't think "aggregator" would be problematic. Capitalized differently, as "aggregaTor" or "AggregaTor", it might be. All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVEDYWAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCrKAEH/29mNKWqP0Hjv26SGTuHe9aK B3etHYM2uFnw5nqa+VISOB8gAeH3jvZDeTdasd6EVUrSWJ8hGkks8Mx6w/Vq1CLL k+80ITEkVql9goqRTruQX1ioEebiVE3M5dW3JXZWqJNC6kr5s3bfipTkAqPWdOgX Jq7aD9klYz6XGpMRWVpGDa5pMZkXBGFy1Q5nq+VA2rahhSuYRNbzshZbnoqHT3oU cQOW40ak3kH6S3NAKOyb64JEU5twhWzn3WQYiwEkQnwz/gIScvCAVG0hbH4wG+Ij Y1XkQR7goevDvv0KS5BFiOcBqomL832xfcUhuUv+3irqXlh9F/8+0PIl6EqIQAQ= =NTVx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----